looks like we may have to settle with Pac vs. JMM come February because MAB don't want to have a rematch with Pacman.
Pacquiao, Roach Say "Bring On Barrera"
Collapse
-
Well I think thats the way it should be, he needs to prove himself against Juan Manuel before going on to bigger fishes, not that JMM is a chump.Comment
-
Why would Pac duck Marquez, when all he could do was to survived PAc's onslaught only. He was the one who was down 3 times in round 1 and not Pac.Originally posted by rslC'mon guys we all saw this coming, makes perfect sense, I'd duck Marquez too if I was Pacquaio's handler's and plus i'd obviously be more lucrative for a PAC - MAB rematch than w/ Marquez. I wouldn't let Pac get anywhere near Marquez 'cause it could be worse than the 1st time.
JMM was a virtual unknown until he fought Manny! Manny is still the man in the superfeather!!!Comment
-
Manny, the real fighter he is always ready to fight whoever out there that is willing to give him a good fight -- that is including JMM himself. The problem with JMM was that he showed he was hesitant to engage the Pacman in a rematch again. But it's smarter to face MAB first since it will surely earn him guaranteed money first before facing the "tag-me-if-you-can" JMM who will surely play safe at any opportunity he gets with the Pacman.Comment
-
pacman-jmm 2 a done deal???????it means the scorecards are rigged!!!!!!!not unless pacman hammers jmm below the ground.....sh!@#$%^&t happens again at the scores!!!!!!!
better pacman-mab 2..........counterpunching sucks like jmm & judges!!!Comment
-
for me I prefer Pac to face JMM first come Feb to settle the score, and fight either MAB or Erick after that...
but reality it does not matter who PAC will fight first each one of the 3Ms has a belt on his waist the PAC is hungry to have, plus the fact that all 3 fights will be mega bucks fight for the PAC...Comment
Comment