Hello WBA,WBC,IBF,WBO,IBO. Can you give this to us.

[Amazinger]

Just a thought on what could be the biggest fight that could be had,And unify all the welterweight championship belt by at the end of 2010.
A proposal:All title fights and must be sanctioned by all boxing governing bodies


1) Manny Pacquiao (WBO super champion) vs Joshua Clottey WBO#1,WBA#4

Winner to fight the winner of:

2) Vyacheslav Senchenko (WBA world champion) vs Jan Zaveck (IBF champion)

3)Shane Mosley (WBA super champ) vs Floyd Mayweather (WBA,WBC,IBO #1)

Winner to fight the winner of:

4) Andre Berto (WBC champion)vs ?(Margarito/Cotto/N'Duo)?

And finally: Winner or 1,2 vs winner of 3,4 will fight with and the winner will get all 4 belts.


What do you say guys.

Do you think there are better fighters need to be added on this list?

It's a pipe dream but it would be great if this happen.

[Marijuana]

Mayweather Mosley Duckquiao. Those are the only names that matter.

[Amazinger]

Mayweather Mosley Duckquiao. Those are the only names that matter.

Mayweather,Clottey,Margarito and Cotto don't have any belt........

[Marijuana]

Mayweather,Clottey,Margarito and Cotto don't have any belt........

Belts mean less than the dookie I just laid in the toilet.

Oh wait, I just saw you bring up Margarito's name. "peeleft:

[apokalips]

Mayweather,Clottey,Margarito and Cotto don't have any belt........

The winner of a Mayweather - Pacquiao - Mosley triangle would be considered lineal though most likely, as Floyd retired with that distinction.

[Amazinger]

The winner of a Mayweather - Pacquiao - Mosley triangle would be considered lineal though most likely, as Floyd retired with that distinction.

It's just for the present title holders and top contenders to fight just each other until one is left.(within 12 months)

[Amazinger]

Belts mean less than the dookie I just laid in the toilet.

Oh wait, I just saw you bring up Margarito's name. "peeleft:

And?.......your point is?.

[Amazinger]

Belts mean less than the dookie I just laid in the toilet.

Oh wait, I just saw you bring up Margarito's name. "peeleft:

Co'z Margarito is in the undercard of Pacquiao Clottey...

[Syf]

I agree, belts are close to useless to the top tier guys.


they are a footnote, like "this fighter did this and this and this, oh, and he also has a belt"

[Amazinger]

I agree, belts are close to useless to the top tier guys.


they are a footnote, like "this fighter did this and this and this, oh, and he also has a belt"

Not entirely true.......Every up and coming boxer's aim is almost always the belt.To go up in two or more of boxings governing body's rating.Some people disregard and even treat it with disdain.Since it does'nt help to their side of the discussion/argument.

We can only ask why does boxer show off their belts if they're worthless.