NSAC: Manny Pacquiao's Drug Test results are Negative

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • $partacus
    I'm SPARTACUS
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 4503
    • 248
    • 85
    • 11,373

    #21
    Originally posted by Roger Mellie
    Why in the good f.uck should he have to? Is floyd a commisioner now? There is absolutely f.uck all wrong with the testing as it is and this whole sorry episode was brought about because Floyds classless ****bag of a dad felt threatened by what he saw in the Cotto fight. This whole issue is complete and utter bollocks and was created in its entirety by Floyds camp. This **** was totally avoidable.
    There's nothing wrong with a test that can/has been passed by cheaters?

    Comment

    • Havokk
      Banned
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 161
      • 29
      • 10
      • 399

      #22
      Originally posted by Roger Mellie
      Thats number 2 and number 3. The *****s are waking up.

      Comment

      • jkaisen41
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jan 2009
        • 1383
        • 65
        • 64
        • 7,707

        #23
        Originally posted by Ravishing
        Even if it's a 24 day window, no DRs, athletes, or anyone have confirmed any specific PEDs that would disappear or not be noticed in urine or blood within any amount of time that's been mentioned. Pacquiao wanted a 30 day window, they dropped to 24, Floyd wanted 14. It's not as if Pac wasn't trying to compromise, but by him standing his ground he's automatically looked as su****ious. But that's simply just one convenient way at looking at it, because again...everyone who's accusing Pacquiao of doping up don't even know what they're supposed to find nor are there any prior smoking guns that would make someone believe that. But it's an easy way to make Floyd seem like Pacquiao's trying to hide something, right? Of course!!! Because Floyd's mind games are working, but it's not preventing Pacquiao from sayin, "**** this...You ain't running ****" and is still fighting a top fighter under a big stage which contrary to what people are saying here, will still sell a good amount of PPVs. So in the end, who's really hurting here? The #1 fighter who people are going to see regardless, or the former #1 fighter who the only fighters people wanna see him in the ring with is either Pac or Mosley...and neither fight will happen in March or April.

        Come March time, we'll see who's fights will be held with more anticipation.
        The only reason they dropped to 24 is because it was exposed that he took a test 24 days before the Hatton fight... they ain't tried to make a deal it was just like they looked like complete idiots after this came out dude...

        But who cares anymore... the fight is dead...

        Mayweather will beat Mosley and will take the only real good match up that Pacquiao has left away (Bradley and all the others aren't on the level of Mosley now)... Mosley will take Olympic testing and Pacquiao will sooner or later have to agree to it too... and then we have our fight

        Comment

        • $partacus
          I'm SPARTACUS
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2008
          • 4503
          • 248
          • 85
          • 11,373

          #24
          Originally posted by Ravishing
          Even if it's a 24 day window, no DRs, athletes, or anyone have confirmed any specific PEDs that would disappear or not be noticed in urine or blood within any amount of time that's been mentioned. Pacquiao wanted a 30 day window, they dropped to 24, Floyd wanted 14. It's not as if Pac wasn't trying to compromise, but by him standing his ground he's automatically looked as su****ious. But that's simply just one convenient way at looking at it, because again...everyone who's accusing Pacquiao of doping up don't even know what they're supposed to find nor are there any prior smoking guns that would make someone believe that. But it's an easy way to make Floyd seem like Pacquiao's trying to hide something, right? Of course!!! Because Floyd's mind games are working, but it's not preventing Pacquiao from sayin, "**** this...You ain't running ****" and is still fighting a top fighter under a big stage which contrary to what people are saying here, will still sell a good amount of PPVs. So in the end, who's really hurting here? The #1 fighter who people are going to see regardless, or the former #1 fighter who the only fighters people wanna see him in the ring with is either Pac or Mosley...and neither fight will happen in March or April.

          Come March time, we'll see who's fights will be held with more anticipation.
          Obviously you haven't read the interview with Don Catlin, he said there's peds that can leave the body in hours.

          Comment

          • Roger Mellie
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Oct 2008
            • 5969
            • 367
            • 385
            • 6,591

            #25
            Originally posted by Six Shooter
            There's nothing wrong with a test that can/has been passed by cheaters?
            How recently?

            Comment

            • Ravishing
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 4798
              • 181
              • 47
              • 11,175

              #26
              Originally posted by P4P305
              Then, why didn't he agreed to do it?
              It's a thing of principality. If Pacquiao was balking all the way through with blood testing, then it's much easier to look at Pacquiao in a different light, but we all know that's not the case. A lot of this has to do with egos, because whether people want to believe it or not, Floyd isn't the only fighter now who calling the shots and that in itself has made Floyd go on the defensive a lot dating back to last Summer when the potential fight was in the air. Floyd demanded extensive drug testing for the 1st time in his entire career against someone who's NEVER tested positive nor was there ever any su****ion. Nobody with a single bit of intelligence and knowing Floyd Mayweather NEVER once thought of all of this as head games on Mayweather's part?

              Comment

              • Ravishing
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2009
                • 4798
                • 181
                • 47
                • 11,175

                #27
                Originally posted by Six Shooter
                Obviously you haven't read the interview with Don Catlin, he said there's peds that can leave the body in hours.
                I mean then what do you want? LOL then don't watch sports anymore. Because if they're going to use something that's undetected in hours, they're obviously not going to take blood right before you fight, so for all we know Floyd could be doping up to right?

                It's just dumb, because in the end, doping doesn't make you a better fight by any means...ask Fernando Vargas.

                To me, Floyd was playing head games, and it back fired with one guy still fighting and the other is under the microscope to who he'll be fighting next which at 2nd best won't be Mosley.

                Comment

                • freddyp
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 175
                  • 2
                  • 28
                  • 6,231

                  #28
                  If I'm not mistaken the NSBC only test urine, and blood for HIV. Where does the link state blood testing?

                  Comment

                  • mazdaru
                    Banned
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 1006
                    • 31
                    • 7
                    • 1,124

                    #29
                    ravishing=REACHING, of epic proportions

                    Comment

                    • Ravishing
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Apr 2009
                      • 4798
                      • 181
                      • 47
                      • 11,175

                      #30
                      Originally posted by freddyp
                      If I'm not mistaken the NSBC only test urine, and blood for HIV. Where does the link state blood testing?
                      All they did was urine tests

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP