ouma got robbed......and the fact that anyone could think this figt was close disgusts me......flashy punches dont mean effectiveness.........ouma controlled the fight and landed at will with his jab......
It wasn't a robbery because it was a very close fight. I had it 95-94 for Vanes. I thought it would be scored a SD or a MD.
I was a bit disgusted at the judges too-wide scorecards, but the right man got the decision.
Vanes inexperience was in evidence during the fight, and Ouma seemed tired and didn't do much in the later rounds. He was hurt near the end of the 10th - if it had been 12 rounds, I think Kassim would have been stopped.
How? He got outworked in a lot of rounds, knocked down, missed a lot too. Winning very clearly is giving him the scores that the judges gave him, which were completely and utterly wrong.
That fight was not a clear victory for either guy, though Ouma did more according to nearly everyone here especially with the KD. If it was a clear win for anyone it was for Ouma, not Vanes.
Everyone I've talked to about the fight says Ouma was robbed. Sounds like a bull**** decision. Not surprised the white supremacist had Vanes winning though lol.
I thought a draw would have been very appropriate. Vanes controlled the early action, the announcers were talking about ouma's effectiveness but I didnt see that until later in the fight. After the middle rounds Ouma was mugging vanes and after the eye got cut it was bugging him, the knockdown looked like Vanes feet were crossed and he fell after getting hit. Technically still a knockdown but he wasnt hurt at all. I thought Vanes deserved a draw, but if Ouma won, I wouldnt have complained. the Cards were totally wrong.
Damn!!!... it really pisses me off when these bs decisions happens... there was no doubt that ouma won... and the scores were lop sided for vanes..... WTF!!!!
Has VanesBoxing crawled out from under his rock yet?
Comment