Comments Thread For: Keith Kizer Talks Blood Tests, Margarito's License

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Larrysbird
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 662
    • 9
    • 4
    • 6,793

    #41
    Originally posted by check hook
    ^^

    Co-sign the post and your sig,
    There are athletes affected by the test though as they claimed.

    Comment

    • philborda
      Amateur
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • Aug 2009
      • 7
      • 0
      • 0
      • 6,022

      #42
      Regulatory bodies like nsac are not serious in stopping illegal substance use

      If Kizer really mean what he says, that the purpose of drug testing is to deter people from using it, then he should consider increasing the penalty of suspension to at least three (3) years. It will have an effect of retiring the culprit and would discourage future users. If Margarito can fight and become champion again, what example does it show future users? They can use illegal substances to gain undue advantage over their opponents, and if caught, which is a high improbability anyway, they can just rest for a while and become champions again in due time. That's why the present system does not deter athletes from using these illegal substances. Would you blame me if I think that the reason why Mayweather has no loss yet is because he is using it? He is a member of a family who are convicted pushers and users.

      Comment

      • maddox22
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Nov 2009
        • 140
        • 16
        • 0
        • 6,176

        #43
        Originally posted by brutus25
        kizer didnt mention epo or hgh testing because hes an idiot those rrr undetectable in urine, its a joke ill just go and take eop and hgh and become a boxer and dominate fighters and make millions of dollares on steroids.
        you're the idiot.

        Comment

        • badboypeenoy
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 3203
          • 54
          • 44
          • 9,669

          #44
          Originally posted by brutus25
          kizer didnt mention epo or hgh testing because hes an idiot those rrr undetectable in urine, its a joke ill just go and take eop and hgh and become a boxer and dominate fighters and make millions of dollares on steroids.
          "Urinary testing is the only scientifically validated method for direct detection of recombinant EPO." - World Anti-Doping Agency

          HgH while detectable only in blood, does not have a scientifically validated testing method that is commercially available. Any positive finding can be questioned and will not stand in the court of law...unless you can give me a link that says otherwise.
          Last edited by badboypeenoy; 01-16-2010, 12:09 AM.

          Comment

          • v.cassiusali@ya
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 3659
            • 55
            • 0
            • 13,298

            #45
            kizer is short of saying that a scared fighter will not run out of excuses. now a fighter asked olympic-style doping test. next he will ask winter-games style doping test.

            you simply cannot expect a scared man to fight against the greatest fighter of this planet.

            Comment

            • zazenradical
              Amateur
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • May 2008
              • 4
              • 0
              • 0
              • 6,086

              #46
              Originally posted by badboypeenoy
              HgH while detectable only in blood, does not have a scientifically validated testing method that is commercially available. Any positive finding can be questioned and will not stand in the court of law...unless you can give me a link that says otherwise.
              According to the WADA, there is a scientifically validated testing method, but the site mentions that it is not yet commercially available. However, that seems somewhat irrelevant, since it was administered at the Summer Olympics in 2004:

              "The current test is reliable...The test was introduced at the Athens Olympic Games in 2004 and other major sport events. However, because hGH is often taken by doping athletes in the offseason for the anabolic effect, the test is most effective when implemented in a no-advance-notice out-of-competition strategy."

              I can't post a link because I have too few posts. However, the information is easily found by doing a search for HGH at the WADA's site.

              Comment

              • badboypeenoy
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 3203
                • 54
                • 44
                • 9,669

                #47
                Originally posted by zazenradical
                According to the WADA, there is a scientifically validated testing method, but the site mentions that it is not yet commercially available. However, that seems somewhat irrelevant, since it was administered at the Summer Olympics in 2004:

                "The current test is reliable...The test was introduced at the Athens Olympic Games in 2004 and other major sport events. However, because hGH is often taken by doping athletes in the offseason for the anabolic effect, the test is most effective when implemented in a no-advance-notice out-of-competition strategy."

                I can't post a link because I have too few posts. However, the information is easily found by doing a search for HGH at the WADA's site.
                "Out of competition" is how many days before competition? Is there a cut-off date?

                Comment

                • Boxing Scene
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 7105
                  • 915
                  • 1,705
                  • 29,819

                  #48
                  Originally posted by fernie
                  I still support him. So **** *** braddman lol.
                  That's because you're a piece of ****.

                  Comment

                  • Boxing Scene
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jan 2007
                    • 7105
                    • 915
                    • 1,705
                    • 29,819

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Don Golpe
                    Who the *** is Braddman!!
                    What difference does it make WHO I AM? I support NOT bringing a deadly weapon into the ring. If you don't, there's something wrong with you.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP