Manny Pacquiao Proven NEGATIVE at a Random Blood Test (facts & proof)

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Baits
    Banned
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 31
    • 5
    • 5
    • 76

    #1

    Manny Pacquiao Proven NEGATIVE at a Random Blood Test (facts & proof)

  • GREEN GIANT
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Aug 2009
    • 154
    • 14
    • 9
    • 259

    #2
    So basically, the last time Manny tested negative he lost. Seriously it a invalid point talking about what happened at featherweight almost 7 years ago. Alot has changed.

    Comment

    • DiLLiNGER
      Banned
      • Jan 2009
      • 6093
      • 324
      • 423
      • 7,749

      #3
      So he took a random blood test before?? Why not now?? 40 million?? hmm??

      Comment

      • baCCaT
        Onion Strength
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2006
        • 1451
        • 677
        • 429
        • 10,211

        #4
        good effort.

        but the damage is done and is irreversible...

        forever will pacs name be tainted with something out of su****ion and speculation-already a bad thing as it is...

        even with lawsuits, mudslinging and added tests for pac, it will never be the same.
        team pac and top rank knows this. thats why they pulled the plug on the fight.

        deny mayweather the fight and you deny him the millions.

        as pbf would say "in here for the money"

        a twisted maligned form of justice. that is the best logical conclusion

        Comment

        • R.M {7}
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 1162
          • 61
          • 41
          • 7,778

          #5
          He took a random blood test 2 days before the Moralez fight and they come up nothing. That whole video doesn't even have evidence just points. Seroiusly, Manny's arguement for losing to Morelez was that the bloo taking out of him weaken him.

          Comment

          • - JCHING -
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2009
            • 2361
            • 74
            • 3
            • 9,222

            #6
            ******, ****** video.

            So the only reason Pacquiao lost against Morales, was because he had a bit of blood taken 2 days prior? It had nothing to do with Morales being the better fighter on the night?

            Also, Mayweather offered a 14 day cut off, so what advantage would he gain from that? Surely it doesn't take Pacquiao, a fully grown man, 14 days to recover from a teaspoon of blood?

            Whatever way you look at it, Pacquiao looks su****ious now and will be even more under the steroid spotlight -because of his own actions.

            Comment

            • MrEvol
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Nov 2009
              • 338
              • 100
              • 154
              • 6,732

              #7
              When your a millioner and had alot of sponsors I wouldnt do anything just because one person told me so. But if its a rule then I would follow it.

              Comment

              • Killa_Kali
                Capoeirista
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Nov 2009
                • 10750
                • 225
                • 225
                • 11,857

                #8
                Originally posted by Baits
                he did? wow.

                but he's yoked on creatine yo!

                Comment

                • Rhonald
                  Amateur
                  Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 8
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  • 6,034

                  #9
                  Originally posted by - JCHING -
                  ******, ****** video.

                  So the only reason Pacquiao lost against Morales, was because he had a bit of blood taken 2 days prior? It had nothing to do with Morales being the better fighter on the night?

                  Also, Mayweather offered a 14 day cut off, so what advantage would he gain from that? Surely it doesn't take Pacquiao, a fully grown man, 14 days to recover from a teaspoon of blood?

                  Whatever way you look at it, Pacquiao looks su****ious now and will be even more under the steroid spotlight -because of his own actions.


                  And how about the test after the fight that Pacquiao's Team has proposed???
                  Gayweather's fans is ridiculous... I don't know why they always open their mouth before they use their brain...

                  Comment

                  • stormfroe
                    £ for £
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 284
                    • 27
                    • 17
                    • 6,409

                    #10
                    LOL at clucky not getting his cash.

                    Comment

                    • Working...
                      TOP