Floyd vs. Williams / Berto could be illegal......

[ANDROID_DOES]

who gives a ****. *** nate campbell. He should never get a floyd fight. Nate's the biggest ***** in boxing. I hope he gets knocked the *** out and sent back into retirement, back to the grocery store packing groceries in florida. I find nates trash talking funny. All in desperate hopes to get a fight.

[Scott9945]

One Punch is not a *****. He comes with boxing facts because he knows them

Considering his fighter (Nate Campbell) will probably be trying to KO Mayweather soon, the "*****" label doesn't seem valid.

[Doctor_Tenma]

who gives a ****. *** nate campbell. He should never get a floyd fight. Nate's the biggest ***** in boxing. I hope he gets knocked the *** out and sent back into retirement, back to the grocery store packing groceries in florida. I find nates trash talking funny. All in desperate hopes to get a fight.

Thats a very hateful thing to say.

[Akyra]

floyds mere existence is illegal!!!!!!!!!!!

[Vasyl’s dad]

conflicts of interest are not exclusive to Florida dip****. I brought the statute up because I happen to be familiar with it.

Familiar with it or not,

its still a horrible point as to why a fight can't be made.

Florida is not the beginning and end of where bouts take place.

[zizou312]

i thought kelly was fighting williams?

[OnePunch]

Familiar with it or not,

its still a horrible point as to why a fight can't be made.

Florida is not the beginning and end of where bouts take place.

you're missing the point. It had nothing to do with Florida. I simply used Florida law as an example of why the "Haymon conflict" is NOT bull****, as some idiots keep saying it is. Similar language is also in H.R. 523, which is the new Federal Commission bill that Peter King and McCain are trying to pass.

Its just funny to me that morons say the "Haymon conflict" is bull****, I point out an example of a state statute that I happen to be familiar with (I also know Pennsylvania and New York also have similar laws on the books), and people STILL argue the point and say "thats only in Florida". LOL. I give up. I cant argue with "experts" hahaha

[ANDROID_DOES]

you're missing the point. It had nothing to do with Florida. I simply used Florida law as an example of why the "Haymon conflict" is NOT bull****, as some idiots keep saying it is. Similar language is also in H.R. 523, which is the new Federal Commission bill that Peter King and McCain are trying to pass.

Its just funny to me that morons say the "Haymon conflict" is bull****, I point out an example of a state statute that I happen to be familiar with (I also know Pennsylvania and New York also have similar laws on the books), and people STILL argue the point and say "thats only in Florida". LOL. I give up. I cant argue with "experts" hahaha

so tell me the history of all this. why is this being brought up?

[Vasyl’s dad]

you're missing the point. It had nothing to do with Florida. I simply used Florida law as an example of why the "Haymon conflict" is NOT bull****, as some idiots keep saying it is. Similar language is also in H.R. 523, which is the new Federal Commission bill that Peter King and McCain are trying to pass.

Its just funny to me that morons say the "Haymon conflict" is bull****, I point out an example of a state statute that I happen to be familiar with (I also know Pennsylvania and New York also have similar laws on the books), and people STILL argue the point and say "thats only in Florida". LOL. I give up. I cant argue with "experts" hahaha

So, even if I missed the point,

how does Bob Arum do it?

how did King do it?

How does any manager not named Haymon do it?


Its simply a terrible excuse.

[OnePunch]

So, even if I missed the point,

how does Bob Arum do it?

how did King do it?

How does any manager not named Haymon do it?


Its simply a terrible excuse.

Arum and King are "promoters", not "managers". The rules are different. And there are some managers who do it. But just because someone else might have gotten away with it, that doesnt make it any less unethical. A manager SHOULDNT represent both sides of a fight, anymore than a lawyer should argue both sides of a case.

Think about it. If you were Berto or Williams, do you really want Floyds manager representing you in the negotiations for a fight with Floyd? And even though Haymon is a pretty square-dealing guy, the appearance of a conflict is unavoidable