When it comes down to it, Pacquiao agreed to the EXTRA testing Floyd requested
Collapse
-
Have fun.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I'm fine with the results of the NSAC and the other commissions as they've caught boxers over the last 10 years.
If your reason is because he refused a test that isn't the standard,
then you'll surely agree that every other fighter who hasn't done the blood testing is guilty as well.
I don't see many, if any at all voluntarily doing the testing that was asked for.
But just curious, other than the refusal to bow down to Floyd,
what other reasons gave you su****ion that he was on PEDs?Comment
-
That the boxing community has been up in arms about steroids for years.
Second, the "standard testing not being good enough" has been touted by many. Over years.
Two writers don't make up the boxing community, nor does it equate to "many".Comment
-
Comment
-
if it was a formula it goes like this
NSAC = compulsory
Floyd's camp = Xdemand
Pacman's camp = Ydemand
!= Not equal to
== is equal to
Scenario 1:
Xdemand == drug test but Xdemand != NSAC then
Ydemand has option to say Yes or No.
Ydemand picked option Yes from Xdemand but with a corresponding Ydemand so Xdemand too has the option to say Yes or No. This will go on forever since NSAC will be the deciding factor which will only allow option Yes since it is compulsory.
Scenario 2:
If and only if NSAC == Xdemand then
Ydemand option is only Yes.
But as what happened Xdemand != NSAC so Scenario 1 happened.
It goes interesting when this formula was applied to Schaeffer during Mosley fight they also turned down testing outside NSAC and they're applying this formula to pacman in which to some extent pacman agreed.
Do you all understand now?Last edited by imscythe; 01-13-2010, 08:01 PM.Comment
Comment