M. Hatton or Nate Campbell, who's better?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tanibanana
    Banned
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • May 2009
    • 690
    • 484
    • 623
    • 8,924

    #1

    M. Hatton or Nate Campbell, who's better?

    M. Hatton & N. Campbell are two possible opponent for Floyd, like
    99%.. Who do you feel is better between the two?
    22
    M. Hatton
    9.09%
    2
    N. Campbell
    59.09%
    13
    Who Cares
    31.82%
    7

    The poll is expired.

  • Curtis Jackson
    Banned
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Jan 2010
    • 85
    • 6
    • 1
    • 140

    #2
    Nate....he more experienced than matt

    Comment

    • MexicanMauler
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 1395
      • 109
      • 60
      • 7,710

      #3
      I hope to god he does not fight Nate or Campbell...

      You guys know that they never planned to fight on March 13, Floyd and Pac both wanted tune up fights. They're getting them now, they're just building up hype for when they fight on May 1.

      Comment

      • Tmann400
        The Rangy Counter-Puncher
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 3140
        • 184
        • 43
        • 9,979

        #4
        there not even comparable. matthew hattonis a top 40 fighter at best. nateis a former undisputed world champion. just for the record i dont want to see mayweather fight neither of these guys

        Comment

        • kymira
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2008
          • 1010
          • 58
          • 84
          • 7,312

          #5
          Exactly there not even on the same level. Mathew is only relevant because of his last name.

          Comment

          • murmagic
            This Is Anfield
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2009
            • 1217
            • 354
            • 216
            • 7,488

            #6
            nate would be a better fight

            Comment

            • hammerhiem
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2008
              • 4877
              • 129
              • 102
              • 11,163

              #7
              At 147? Hatton.

              Campbell has all of 1 fight at 140 and he was getting his ass royally kicked.

              Comment

              • alexpz
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2009
                • 24237
                • 302
                • 245
                • 32,138

                #8
                Originally posted by murmagic
                nate would be a better fight
                Yeah it would be a better fight if it happens in LW.

                Comment

                • bojangles1987
                  bo jungle
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 41118
                  • 1,326
                  • 357
                  • 63,028

                  #9
                  Nate Campbell has been at a championship level before, whereas I didn't know Ricky Hatton had a brother named Matthew boxing until a few months ago.

                  Comment

                  • TBear
                    Lords of Boxingscene
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2008
                    • 113275
                    • 6,079
                    • 12,778
                    • 1,665,677,098

                    #10
                    neither! Why are these guys being looked at. There are 32 guys better at welterweight than them, why not one of the light middleweight champs? Floyd can't make 147, why not move up and fight a worthy fighter and a worthy fight! If he wants big money, we want a big fight!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP