Why are *******s so fanatical?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • flexxx145
    Banned
    • Dec 2009
    • 2085
    • 87
    • 106
    • 2,291

    #41
    I can't give him any props for smashin on Cotto. I think Cotto was already damaged by that bum Margacheato. Cotto hasn't been the same since and really needs to take at least a year off to recover.

    Comment

    • Gutz
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2008
      • 4039
      • 142
      • 99
      • 10,693

      #42
      Originally posted by flexxx145
      I can't give him any props for smashin on Cotto. I think Cotto was already damaged by that bum Margacheato. Cotto hasn't been the same since and really needs to take at least a year off to recover.


      You must be a pac-hater alt.. who got banned before..

      Comment

      • ShoguNinja
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Jan 2009
        • 496
        • 16
        • 0
        • 6,604

        #43
        Most of Pacquiao's Haters are Kids on their teens getting their "facts" on internet blogs of some would be "boxing expert" who gets his "facts" on Youtube. I PITY THOSE FOOLS!!!

        Comment

        • flexxx145
          Banned
          • Dec 2009
          • 2085
          • 87
          • 106
          • 2,291

          #44
          Frazier, Foreman, Hopkins, Jones, Marciano all fought tougher competition than Pacquiao.

          Comment

          • jrosales13
            undisputed champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 32632
            • 739
            • 763
            • 40,023

            #45
            Originally posted by flexxx145
            Frazier, Foreman, Hopkins, Jones, Marciano all fought tougher competition than Pacquiao.
            Pac is not top 10 and they are not top 10 either for fuck sake... But, yet Pac ranks higher than all of them... Neither one of them have the accomplishment that Pac has...

            Comment

            • FightFreak
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 435
              • 14
              • 2
              • 6,558

              #46
              Originally posted by flexxx145
              Iron Mike and Jones Jr. are not top ten ATG, Pacquiao is.
              -----------------------------------------
              I think this statement makes my case for me. Anybody ranking Pac higher than RJJ and Iron Mike is a jonny come lately to boxing. I hope you were just jokin.
              Nope. It does tell us te extent of your knowledge, though. This is not the 80s or 90s, grandpa. Those guys have been weighed, and sadly, have been found wanting. Pac's career is not yet over, but his achievements have far outstripped theirs.

              Comment

              • flexxx145
                Banned
                • Dec 2009
                • 2085
                • 87
                • 106
                • 2,291

                #47
                You must mean the 7 titles in 7 weight classes 3 for vacant belts. I think with as many belts as there are these days you can't go by that. You have to go by quality of opponent. Those guys all fought tougher opponents but not all of that is pacs fault.

                Comment

                • Easy-E
                  Gotta want it
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jul 2005
                  • 22686
                  • 865
                  • 1,739
                  • 32,777

                  #48
                  It is pretty pathetic. They are nearly all very new to boxing and have little knowledge of the sport. Logic is beyond them, and they are beginning to destroy NSB.

                  Comment

                  • jrosales13
                    undisputed champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 32632
                    • 739
                    • 763
                    • 40,023

                    #49
                    Originally posted by flexxx145
                    You must mean the 7 titles in 7 weight classes 3 for vacant belts. I think with as many belts as there are these days you can't go by that. You have to go by quality of opponent. Those guys all fought tougher opponents but not all of that is pacs fault.
                    WTF? What 3 vacant belts are you talking about? Name them please?

                    Comment

                    • FightFreak
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 435
                      • 14
                      • 2
                      • 6,558

                      #50
                      Originally posted by flexxx145
                      You must mean the 7 titles in 7 weight classes 3 for vacant belts. I think with as many belts as there are these days you can't go by that. You have to go by quality of opponent. Those guys all fought tougher opponents but not all of that is pacs fault.
                      Speaking of which: Sasakul (lineal@Fly ); Barrera (1st fight @ Featherweight against a top P4P and lineal champ); Marquez @ Feather and SF (where Marquez was the lineal; Morales 3X @ SF; Hatton (lineal @ LWW); Cotto (WW). Half of these are 1st lock HOF, the rest are either borderline (Cotto) or were the lineal champs in their division (Hatton, Sasakul).

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP