What would you all say if Nate won??

[PrtyBoyDlicious]

thats a fight we would take as well. Thats the thing with Nate, he will fight ANYBODY. Floyd, JMM, Khan, Maidana, Bradley, whoever. It dont matter. You only have to look at the last 3 contracts he signed to know that he takes all comers.... Guzman....Funeka....Bradley.

Good luck to Nate. I hope he pull this one. He deserved a nice payday!!!

[fugu]

I would probably say welcome to fantasyland, because this isnt reality.

It will NEVER happen. Nate Campbell has 0 threats for Mayweather.

[miron_lang]

just curious, because no matter what Nate does some idiot will always post the Peden clip, or some "expert" will talk about how after 2 rounds they "knew" Bradley was going to beat Nate, or better yet knock Nate out. LOL Like Bradley ever knocks ANYBODY out, especially someone like Nate, who has been on the floor only once in his career and it took a free shot to do that.

The hyprocacy sometimes just cracks me up. A weight drained Nate, probably at 50%, beat Funeka, but here it gets spun as "Nate struggled with a nobody even with a weight advantage". Funeka then smashes everyone's hero Guzman, and now Funeka is Godzilla around here. But he was a bum and a nobody when Nate fought him.

Anyways, so IF this fight were to somehow get made, and IF Nate were to win it, whats the excuse?

1. Floyd didnt get "up" for the fight
2. Floyd was distracted by the Pac lawsuit
3. The internet forum posters, most of who dont support the sport by buying ppv anyways, but instead make 1834 threads looking for free streams dont like him anymore
4. Floyd was overrated
5. (insert new excuse here)


And on a side note to those who can objectively debate an issue, who (realistically) between 140 and 147 would make a better fight then Nate right now? I said "realistically". That means you take shane, berto, top rank fighters, and showtime fighters out of the equation. I think that leaves Nate, Paulie, and maybe Cintron or Quintana (neither of whom are at 147)

And if you can justify Pac vs Clottey (Ben Tackie 2.0), then you can justify this matchup.

HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHA

That's a good one.

[fugu]

And im not really hating on Nate Campbell. He is a good fighter. But he is a good lightweight. He would get destroyed by the best at JR welter and completely embarassed by top ww.

[miron_lang]

And of course I cant be 100% objective,

Goes without saying. I'd say 55%

[miron_lang]

we tried that when Nate was still at 135 with 3 belts. Pac passed.

made up bull**** from a manager. link please. if you can provide a link saying that Campbell management officially offered a fight to Team Pacquiao. I'll apologize and give you 200K pts.

[tesla_power]

just curious, because no matter what Nate does some idiot will always post the Peden clip, or some "expert" will talk about how after 2 rounds they "knew" Bradley was going to beat Nate, or better yet knock Nate out. LOL Like Bradley ever knocks ANYBODY out, especially someone like Nate, who has been on the floor only once in his career and it took a free shot to do that.

The hyprocacy sometimes just cracks me up. A weight drained Nate, probably at 50%, beat Funeka, but here it gets spun as "Nate struggled with a nobody even with a weight advantage". Funeka then smashes everyone's hero Guzman, and now Funeka is Godzilla around here. But he was a bum and a nobody when Nate fought him.

Anyways, so IF this fight were to somehow get made, and IF Nate were to win it, whats the excuse?

1. Floyd didnt get "up" for the fight
2. Floyd was distracted by the Pac lawsuit
3. The internet forum posters, most of who dont support the sport by buying ppv anyways, but instead make 1834 threads looking for free streams dont like him anymore
4. Floyd was overrated
5. (insert new excuse here)


And on a side note to those who can objectively debate an issue, who (realistically) between 140 and 147 would make a better fight then Nate right now? I said "realistically". That means you take shane, berto, top rank fighters, and showtime fighters out of the equation. I think that leaves Nate, Paulie, and maybe Cintron or Quintana (neither of whom are at 147)

And if you can justify Pac vs Clottey (Ben Tackie 2.0), then you can justify this matchup.

There will be no excuse. It would be great for Nate for him to get a good payday. But on paper, this is a mismatch. Personally, I'm not interested in watching this fight and I believe most do not want to watch this either.

Why do you want to see this fight? What are Nate's advantages that could screw Pbf up?

[PrtyBoyDlicious]

[QUOTE=miron_lang;7245814]

made up bull**** from a manager. link please. if you can provide a link saying that Campbell management officially offered a fight to Team Pacquiao. I'll apologize and give you 200K pts.

OnePunch is Nate's manager. It's true, they did offer Pac to fight Nate. Nate even wrote an open letter to Pacquiao.

[miron_lang]

Credit to Nate for what he's achieved. He's clearly a world class boxer. However he has only had one fight above lightweight (and that ended quickly and without resolution) so it's reasonable for people to be unhappy with the matchup.

Funeka wasn't a nobody, but at the same time, hardly anyone on here had seen him fight, so it's not surprising that he wasn't rated that highly. Funeka dominating Guzman makes Nate's earlier victory look a lot better. That's just the way it goes sometimes.

I personally would pick Clottey to beat Campbell. So would most people on here, I'd imagine. So I think that he's a better opponent for a WW fight. Besides, Pac-Clottey has gotten a lot of criticism too.

I think Cintron would be the hardest puncher Floyd has ever faced and he's also the 2nd biggest guy Floyd has ever faced. I see that as a good fight, given the alternatives. Following the JMM fight, a lot of us don't want to see Floyd fight yet another smaller opponent who is has zero wins at either WW or JWW.

It seems as if you think that people have something personal against Nate Campbell. Maybe there are some people like that on here, but the vast majority of criticism for this matchup is not motivated by a dislike for Nate.

I think that is correct. justifying this fight is ridiculous. It's only justifiable IMO if you are direclty connected to nate w/c onepunch is.

[OnePunch]

[QUOTE=miron_lang;7245814]

made up bull**** from a manager. link please. if you can provide a link saying that Campbell management officially offered a fight to Team Pacquiao. I'll apologize and give you 200K pts.

i personally was on a conference call with king and arum about it. i dont remember you being on the call though........

p.s. i dont need the apology or the points, but thanks anyways