To those who think Pacquiao beats Clottey EASILY

[dagrtst]

Pacquiao fought Cotto and he ended up walking away with a bandaged head.



Clottey fought Cotto and didn't have a scratch on him. This is what he did to Cotto:



So please do not say that Pacquiao will win easily. That is nonsense.

[Gutz]

Only one that say Clottey is going to be easy

Are Floyd fans..

[Earl-Hickey]

Pacquiao fought Cotto and he ended up walking away with a bandaged head.



Clottey fought Cotto and didn't have a scratch on him. This is what he did to Cotto:



So please do not say that Pacquiao will win easily. That is nonsense.

And Frazier Beat Ali, Foreman Beats Fraizer, Ali Beats Foreman


Clottey is perfect style opponent for Manny, slow, low workrate, not much power, perfect.

Cotto is a good opponent for Clottey, Pac is a horrible opponent for him.

[B u r n e r]

Theories dont work.

[Bushbaby]

Real boxing fans,not just Pacman or floyd fans,but real fans who follow the sport know that Clottey isn't an easy night for any superstar welterweight!!

[-The Glove-]

Only one that say Clottey is going to be easy

Are Floyd fans..

Exactly! As a Pacfan Im not downplaying Clottey at all. I've only heard from the other side saying he's tailor-made for Pac and will lose easily. He wouldn't be a top WW if he was easy for anybody.

[Gutz]

Exactly! As a Pacfan Im not downplaying Clottey at all. I've only heard from the other side saying he's tailor-made for Pac and will lose easily. He wouldn't be a top WW if he was easy for anybody.

Clottey has a great chin and has WW power.. so he can beat Pac just like any top WW..

[dagrtst]

This isn't a triangle theory. Clottey and Cotto are similar. They both have a peek-a-boo like defense, except Clottey's is better. Both come in with their heads, except Clottey does more.

You're basically looking at all the stuff that gave Pacquiao problems but to a more severe degree.

[bojangles1987]

Pac did this to Cotto:



He also won, whereas Clottey lost. Your triangle theory makes no sense.

[B u r n e r]

This isn't a triangle theory. Clottey and Cotto are similar. They both have a peek-a-boo like defense, except Clottey's is better. Both come in with their heads, except Clottey does more.

You're basically looking at all the stuff that gave Pacquiao problems but to a more severe degree.

Pac did this to Cotto:



He also won, whereas Clottey lost. Your triangle theory makes no sense.

You just owned your own thread TS.