Comments Thread For: Pacquiao-Clottey: No Catch-Weight Needed Says Arum

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • YoungReezy
    Banned
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 777
    • 179
    • 88
    • 1,030

    #11
    Well this is good to hear. The fight will be even now, still I got Pac by Ud or stoppage, he's to much for stationary Clottey. Im putting money(real cash) on Pac.

    Comment

    • damned1974
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 3981
      • 472
      • 323
      • 16,857

      #12
      Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP
      Manny Pacquiao's defense of the WBO welterweight title against Joshua Clottey will not involve a catch-weight. Top Rank CEO Bob Arum told the Manila Bulletin that Pacquiao-Clottey will have no weight stipulations. The fight will be Pacquiao's third at welterweight. He fought and stopped Oscar De La Hoya in 2008. He moved down to 140 to knock Ricky Hatton out last May and then returned to welterweight in November to win the title from Miguel Cotto but there was a catch-weight of 145. With all of the catch-weight fights in the sport, it's refreshing to see a title being defended at the actual division limit. [Click Here To Read More]
      LMAO-its almost like Arum is trying to use the "no catchweight this time" as a major selling point of this fight! I wonder if they are putting the new acquired diamond belt on the line..It's not getting me to reach into my wallet for this ppv....its gonna be free streaming for this one...

      Comment

      • delarmente
        Amateur
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Aug 2006
        • 19
        • 0
        • 0
        • 6,244

        #13
        Let's see pacquiao vs. clottey OR mayweather vs the MATTHEW "THUNDER-LIGHTING-AVENGER" HATTON? No brainer....

        Comment

        • badnewsbrown
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2007
          • 2308
          • 70
          • 106
          • 10,233

          #14
          i doubt roach lets clottey rehydrate to 170..

          Comment

          • Ch@mpBox@PR
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 21432
            • 432
            • 279
            • 22,261

            #15
            Originally posted by Shattered Jaw
            Yer, of course it was a handicap. Cotto was clearly lining up to be the toughest fight of Pac's career. Coming down 1lb from his previous weight was a very, very slight handicap but fair considering Cotto was the far bigger guy anyway and Pac was coming from 138 at JWW.

            And no, I'm not a ******* you Cottosexual.
            Didnt he fougthh DLH at 147?.


            You *******s are worst hipocrits than the *****s!

            Comment

            • S A M U R A I
              Bulletproof
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2008
              • 181694
              • 1,495
              • 1,324
              • 1,419,318

              #16
              Originally posted by badnewsbrown
              i doubt roach lets clottey rehydrate to 170..
              Roach has never put a restriction on any fighters' rehydration weight. It's a myth.



              100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

              Comment

              • solly6
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Aug 2008
                • 581
                • 30
                • 13
                • 6,697

                #17
                Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR
                So you idiots are saying if the guy is a threat, they need to handicap the guy?

                Damn *******s are so ******ed!
                **** head what they were saying is that in the guys first real fight against a p4p welteweight it was fair for cotto to come down to 145 which is basically 1lb from his average weigh in. i thought cotto looked in the best shape of his career he was not at all weight drained and he got the biggest payday of his career. pac was ****ing fighting at 130 a couple years earlier. i love cotto but he wasn't handicapped he just got the **** kicked out of him by one of the best fighters of all time which is exactly what he said.

                Comment

                • Shaktivel
                  Banned
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 163
                  • 203
                  • 119
                  • 7,680

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR
                  Didnt he fougthh DLH at 147?.


                  You *******s are worst hipocrits than the *****s!
                  dammn...cotto stans can't take the beating pac gave cotto.

                  Comment

                  • BadBrains
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 779
                    • 22
                    • 3
                    • 6,879

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR
                    Didnt he fougthh DLH at 147?.


                    You *******s are worst hipocrits than the *****s!
                    ur so far up cotto's ass it's unbelievable.

                    Comment

                    • Bigchill79
                      Interim Champion
                      • Jul 2004
                      • 730
                      • 13
                      • 0
                      • 6,847

                      #20
                      Yes yes, Clottey 2 big 4 catch weight

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP