Old Fighters vs Modern Fighters
Collapse
-
-
mosley even now at 38 is fighter top competition, and not just that, men that are 10+ younger than him
prime mosley is fast and ferocious and will bomb you, tommy hearns barely had defence, that whole ''keep him at a distance with my jab'' **** would'nt have worked for longComment
-
a 36 year old mosley is defienetly a prime mobile mosley isn't it?
mosley even now at 38 is fighter top competition, and not just that, men that are 10+ younger than him
prime mosley is fast and ferocious and will bomb you, tommy hearns barely had defence, that whole ''keep him at a distance with my jab'' **** would'nt have worked for long
If Forrest could flatten Mosley, why wouldn't Hearns. He hit harder and faster.Comment
-
Comment
-
Yes, but Gomez, Pintor and Zarate are greater than Juanma and Caballero!!Comment
-
Mosley could be dangerous for Hearns. Hearns would outbox him, but Shane is fitter and has the power to knock Hearns out, and he would keep coming and have a strong chance of scoring a late KOComment
-
1. Yes I did pick Pavlik as an example of how **** MW is. It certainly wasn't before! Robinson, Monzon, Hagler, Nunn, Toney, McCallum, Hopkins, Jones etc etc.
2. There is a big divide between those fighters and todays. Pacquaio and Mayweather are the obvious standouts, but these aren't career WWs are they? Floyd is yet to face an elite fighter at the weight and one fight for Pacquiao against top competition does not make him the new SRL! Leonard, Hearns, Duran > Cotto, Margarito , Williams in terms of resume and skill.Comment
-
Yes, he could be dangerous. I acknowledged that, but the other poster acted as if Mosley was odds on to win.Comment
-
Comment
Comment