Who the **** is marquez?!? He is just as must as a bum as pac! Mayweather is undefeated! Mayweather has the record for makin the most money in a fight! Nuff said! The only control pac has is... well he doesn't have control after the roids to control of him! I refuse to watch anything less then to see pac get his punk a$$ beat for 12 rounds by mayweather! I will not be supporting the roid rage juiced up little piece of **** until he stfu and fight the best in the world... and that my people is mayweather! Don't be ****** and bet against "Money" that you for your co operation haha!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: After the Dust Has Settled – Pacquiao Still in Control
Collapse
-
Originally posted by bellagio510ak View PostWOW..like i said "EDUCATE YOUR SELF ON THE SUBJECT MATTER BEFORE YOUR START SPITTING OUT ALL THAT VERBAL DIARRHEA.."
mosely never failed a drug test either smart guy..he admitted to using P.E.D.s later on..go do ur homework first..then u can start flappin ur beak..
Comment
-
this is garbage.add up the numbers for mayweather versus hatton,de la hoya,and marquez.thats 3 fights. then add up pacquiao versus marquez,hatton,de la hoya,and cotto.thats 4 fights.and floyds numbers are still more than pacs. easy work for the real p4p king money mayweather.
Comment
-
-
- Mayweather vs Hatton
- Mayweather vs ODLH
- Mayweather vs JMM
Did more PPV buys than
- PAc vs Hatton
- Pac vs ODLH
- Pac vs JMM
- Pac vs Cotto
Mayweather vs JMM did more PPV buys (in a recession) than 2 fights of Pac vs JMM.
So T.K. Stewart if you are reading this go and eat your own excrement!!!
Comment
-
T.K. Stewart Get The Phuck Off Pacquaio's Jock
This is for all you Pacquaio nuthuggers!
Dr. Don H. Catlin, the head of the Los Angeles-based non-profit Anti-Doping Research, Inc., said a 24-day cutoff for blood testing is not sufficient to prevent abuse. One of the concerns with such a long blood-testing cutoff prior to the date of competition would be the potential use of Erythropoietin, or EPO.
But Catlin said that wouldn’t be the only concern if there were a 24-day cutoff imposed.
“If you have a 24-day window that’s free, with no testing, you can take whatever you want and you’re not going to get caught, end of story,” Catlin said. “[Urine testing] does matter, yes, but they’re not going to catch everything by urine testing alone. What you would do is to take Mircera [a type of EPO], which is available and which is not easy to detect in urine and away you go. You need a blood test.”
This is why the fight between he and Mayweather isn't going down. Although nuthugging sycophants like T.K. Stewart will scapegoat Mayweather. Now Clottey is being built by the lame-stream media as being a suitable replacement for Mayweather. As though Clottey is this "unbelievable" fighter. So getting all "juiced" up and kicking Clottey's @ $ $ doesn't prove a damn thing. Hell Timothy Bradley, a light welterweight, would present more of a challenge than Clottey.
Comment
-
Originally posted by blackops View PostThis is for all you Pacquaio nuthuggers!
Dr. Don H. Catlin, the head of the Los Angeles-based non-profit Anti-Doping Research, Inc., said a 24-day cutoff for blood testing is not sufficient to prevent abuse. One of the concerns with such a long blood-testing cutoff prior to the date of competition would be the potential use of Erythropoietin, or EPO.
But Catlin said that wouldn’t be the only concern if there were a 24-day cutoff imposed.
“If you have a 24-day window that’s free, with no testing, you can take whatever you want and you’re not going to get caught, end of story,” Catlin said. “[Urine testing] does matter, yes, but they’re not going to catch everything by urine testing alone. What you would do is to take Mircera [a type of EPO], which is available and which is not easy to detect in urine and away you go. You need a blood test.”
This is why the fight between he and Mayweather isn't going down. Although nuthugging sycophants like T.K. Stewart will scapegoat Mayweather. Now Clottey is being built by the lame-stream media as being a suitable replacement for Mayweather. As though Clottey is this "unbelievable" fighter. So getting all "juiced" up and kicking Clottey's @ $ $ doesn't prove a damn thing. Hell Timothy Bradley, a light welterweight, would present more of a challenge than Clottey.
Been trying to tell these fools for ages......recombinant EPO is basically identical to the natural stuff produced by the body and thus difficult to identify.....blackops is taling about CERA or Continuous Erythropoiesis Receptor Activator. "Tour de farce" testing agencies have already been re-analysing frozen B samples to detect it in riders. This is the level of testing boxing needs. Frozen samples to test yrs into the future so cheats are never safe even after they retire. The reality is that 14 days would be enough for EPO to be beneficial....if i was Floyd i wouldn't even offer that.
The more and more info that is coming out (Atlas saying a trusted source confimrs the team pac emails to team mayweather) the worse things start to look for PAc.
To me the bottom line is this. Clean atheltes do not hide from testing. They take it head on to prove they are clean.....like Lance Armstrong did.
Comment
-
Originally posted by blackops View PostThis is for all you Pacquaio nuthuggers!
Dr. Don H. Catlin, the head of the Los Angeles-based non-profit Anti-Doping Research, Inc., said a 24-day cutoff for blood testing is not sufficient to prevent abuse. One of the concerns with such a long blood-testing cutoff prior to the date of competition would be the potential use of Erythropoietin, or EPO.
But Catlin said that wouldn’t be the only concern if there were a 24-day cutoff imposed.
“If you have a 24-day window that’s free, with no testing, you can take whatever you want and you’re not going to get caught, end of story,” Catlin said. “[Urine testing] does matter, yes, but they’re not going to catch everything by urine testing alone. What you would do is to take Mircera [a type of EPO], which is available and which is not easy to detect in urine and away you go. You need a blood test.”
This is why the fight between he and Mayweather isn't going down. Although nuthugging sycophants like T.K. Stewart will scapegoat Mayweather. Now Clottey is being built by the lame-stream media as being a suitable replacement for Mayweather. As though Clottey is this "unbelievable" fighter. So getting all "juiced" up and kicking Clottey's @ $ $ doesn't prove a damn thing. Hell Timothy Bradley, a light welterweight, would present more of a challenge than Clottey.
FYI - CERA isn't the only next gen EPO or ESA's as they are now termed. Labs make this stuff for use in medicine and not only is next gen ESA longer lasting it is safer to use.
It's easy for non-medicinal markets to emerge for PED's when a a single vial of quality stuff can go for $US5,000.
Comment
-
Originally posted by blackops View PostThis is for all you Pacquaio nuthuggers!
Dr. Don H. Catlin, the head of the Los Angeles-based non-profit Anti-Doping Research, Inc., said a 24-day cutoff for blood testing is not sufficient to prevent abuse. One of the concerns with such a long blood-testing cutoff prior to the date of competition would be the potential use of Erythropoietin, or EPO.
But Catlin said that wouldn’t be the only concern if there were a 24-day cutoff imposed.
“If you have a 24-day window that’s free, with no testing, you can take whatever you want and you’re not going to get caught, end of story,” Catlin said. “[Urine testing] does matter, yes, but they’re not going to catch everything by urine testing alone. What you would do is to take Mircera [a type of EPO], which is available and which is not easy to detect in urine and away you go. You need a blood test.”
This is why the fight between he and Mayweather isn't going down. Although nuthugging sycophants like T.K. Stewart will scapegoat Mayweather. Now Clottey is being built by the lame-stream media as being a suitable replacement for Mayweather. As though Clottey is this "unbelievable" fighter. So getting all "juiced" up and kicking Clottey's @ $ $ doesn't prove a damn thing. Hell Timothy Bradley, a light welterweight, would present more of a challenge than Clottey.
Also athletes world athletes who have tested positive for next gen ESA's has been the result of re-analysing blood samples taken previously. So essentially they competed with an illegal edge.
In boxing the consequences are far greater than all other sports. Testing positive after the fact (after a fight) should be considered a failure.
NSAC measures are ineffective, inefficient and above all draconian and out-dated. The NSAC and boxing as a whole is not incentivised to catch dopers because of the negative impact it will have on the sport and the $$ tap.
Comment
-
Pacmans insitence on knowing specific drug testing dates is what any person with a knowledge of PED's would consider a red flag.
Their excuses to not have randomised testing have been beyond pathetic.
Mayweather (even though he was acting in his own interests) has actually done boxing a big service by bringing this issue to the surface.
Any fighter or sportsperson who is for better testing procedures has the moral high ground on a party that opposes it.
Comment
Comment