Morales vs Pacquiao 3.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ben_London
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2008
    • 3993
    • 255
    • 157
    • 11,274

    #1

    Morales vs Pacquiao 3.

    I know Morales at the weigh in, looked like a skeleton on display at the science museum, so was this fight a waste of time?
  • Left Banned Tua
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2010
    • 8398
    • 205
    • 132
    • 9,734

    #2
    Originally posted by Ben_London
    I know Morales at the weigh in, looked like a skeleton on display at the science museum, so was this fight a waste of time?
    hindsight 20/20 it was.

    when it was made it wasn't though.

    people **** on the decision to fight a 3rd time now but people forget all the pac fans and terible fans wanted a 3rd fight.

    people wanted to break the 1-1 tie plus the 1st 2 fights were real good.

    Comment

    • MexicanMauler
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 1395
      • 109
      • 60
      • 7,710

      #3
      Yes, for two reason.
      Morales was way past his prime at that point. Hell, he was past his prime in the first fight, and still handled Pacquiao.
      Two, Pacquiao, per usual, drained his opponent so their performances would suffer.

      Comment

      • Bretty Poy32
        TBE
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jul 2009
        • 6156
        • 335
        • 672
        • 14,138

        #4
        morales was weight drained in his first fight against barrera.
        and morales always look like weight drained at weight day.

        Comment

        • supRa
          supercharged
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2008
          • 6398
          • 640
          • 751
          • 15,121

          #5
          poor morales... he took an unesseary beating.....


          watchin morales take a beating like that almost made me cry

          Comment

          • Left Banned Tua
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jan 2010
            • 8398
            • 205
            • 132
            • 9,734

            #6
            Originally posted by MexicanMauler
            Yes, for two reason.
            Morales was way past his prime at that point. Hell, he was past his prime in the first fight, and still handled Pacquiao.
            Two, Pacquiao, per usual, drained his opponent so their performances would suffer.
            1. no one knew morales was shot. he was winning the 2nd fight up until the last couple rounds before he got koed.

            2. they fought at the same weight in the 3rd fight as they did 1st 2.

            typical revisionist historian.

            if you were following boxing back then you wouldn't have made those comments.

            everybody thought morales was past his best but no one thought he was shot 'til after the 3rd fight.

            Comment

            • Left Banned Tua
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2010
              • 8398
              • 205
              • 132
              • 9,734

              #7
              Originally posted by supRa
              poor morales... he took an unesseary beating.....


              watchin morales take a beating like that almost made me cry
              it was unfortunate but those 3 fights were some of his highest paying bouts ever.

              Comment

              • .Sakuragi.
                Rebound King
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2009
                • 1284
                • 67
                • 62
                • 7,516

                #8
                Pac- 1 Morales- 1

                So that they can settle who really is the betterman.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP