Floyd-USADA conspiracy Urine Test can detect HGH says USADA

[pugay_kamay]

or they are waiting for Floyd Sr. to make another "I Believe" speech ala Martin Luther King..

I wonder how Sr is going to answer during the hearing, hmmmm...

[zeidrich]

they are replying to other threads apparently lol

gonna post this thread to every ***** thread because theyre floyding this one

[chino727]

do you fools not get it? as conte said, there isnt a need for HGH's during training or a fight. its EPO and blood test shows the use of EPO

you *******s keep talking about HGH's.

EPO EPO EPO

http://www.rice.edu/~jenky/sports/epo.html

here's one of the last few paragraphs
Fortunately, testing technology has now caught up and promises to stem the tide of abuse. There is now an accurate urine test that can detect the differences between normal and synthetic EPO. This test is now the standard and was the sole means to detect for EPO use in the 2004 Athens Olympic Games. The reliability of this test helps explain the cascade of athletes who have been caught and, subsequently, banned from competition. This surge in positive tests will likely decline as the “word” gets out and EPO use declines -- at least until someone figures out a work-around. Of course, there is always the next great pharmacologic or genetic cheat just lurking around the corner to consider.

EPO can be found in urine since 05.Do you really think they havent been able to improve on that?

[The Underboss]

the 1 punch KO ...

good one T.S

*****S :

[pugay_kamay]

How GBP, Mayweathers & Travis Tygart - USADA CEO are going to react on this article?

[chino727]

do you fools not get it? as conte said, there isnt a need for HGH's during training or a fight. its EPO and blood test shows the use of EPO

you *******s keep talking about HGH's.

EPO EPO EPO

oh and here's another one...
http://www.letsrun.com/2003/epoqa.php

No. Currently, to be convicted of an EPO offense athletes must test positive for EPO with the urine EPO test. The urine EPO test is not an indirect test that detects unusually high EPO levels. Rather, it is a direct test that detects the actual presence of recombinant EPO (EPO from a source outside the body). Thus, it would be foolish for an athlete to argue that the test was just showing a naturally high level of natural EPO. As Dr. Catlin said to us, with the urine EPO test the testers "see a footprint of the (recombinant EPO) molecule". The World Anti-Doping Report of March 11, 2003, evaluating the urine EPO test concluded, "the urine EPO test is the only existing test to directly evaluate and prove the EPO abuse of athletes"

Blood testing has received a lot of attention because it is a new concept in the drug testing world. There is a blood test for EPO use, but it is only an indirect test that can be used as a screening measure to save money by determining whether the urine EPO test needs to be conducted. All the blood test does is tell the testers that the athlete has an unusual blood profile that warrants further investigation. The abnormal profile could be caused by the use of EPO, some other blood boosting drug, or just be explained by the athlete being a genetic freak or living at altitude. The testers then perform the urine EPO test to determine whether artificial EPO is the cause of the abnormality.

The blood test does not have to be done in order for the athlete to test positive for EPO

as per Dr. Don Catlin one of the preeminent drug testing researchers in the world.

You're welcome....you learn something new everyday

[Sin City]

lets keep this on the front page for a month

[rocky_balboa23]

oh and here's another one...
http://www.letsrun.com/2003/epoqa.php

No. Currently, to be convicted of an EPO offense athletes must test positive for EPO with the urine EPO test. The urine EPO test is not an indirect test that detects unusually high EPO levels. Rather, it is a direct test that detects the actual presence of recombinant EPO (EPO from a source outside the body). Thus, it would be foolish for an athlete to argue that the test was just showing a naturally high level of natural EPO. As Dr. Catlin said to us, with the urine EPO test the testers "see a footprint of the (recombinant EPO) molecule". The World Anti-Doping Report of March 11, 2003, evaluating the urine EPO test concluded, "the urine EPO test is the only existing test to directly evaluate and prove the EPO abuse of athletes"

Blood testing has received a lot of attention because it is a new concept in the drug testing world. There is a blood test for EPO use, but it is only an indirect test that can be used as a screening measure to save money by determining whether the urine EPO test needs to be conducted. All the blood test does is tell the testers that the athlete has an unusual blood profile that warrants further investigation. The abnormal profile could be caused by the use of EPO, some other blood boosting drug, or just be explained by the athlete being a genetic freak or living at altitude. The testers then perform the urine EPO test to determine whether artificial EPO is the cause of the abnormality.

The blood test does not have to be done in order for the athlete to test positive for EPO

as per Dr. Don Catlin one of the preeminent drug testing researchers in the world.

You're welcome....you learn something new everyday

please stop crucifying the Floyd Fans. I guess their silence is enuf and i think it's a sign of their surrender or they already committed suicide..

[zeidrich]

until march 13

[The Underboss]

where is larry x? where is horus? where is soy dominicano (w.e his name is)? where is burner? .