Comments Thread For: Top 25 Fighters of the 00’s: Part I – Missing the Cut

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Top 25 Fighters of the 00’s: Part I – Missing the Cut

    By Cliff Rold - They are all lies of course.

    Anyone who says boxing isn’t good anymore, that it’s dead, that the best never fight each other…lies and damn lies all.

    Sure, the sport isn’t quite what it used to be. Fighters don’t fight enough. There are still bad decisions, hometown calls, and the air of politics. Guess what? The same is true in every professional sport. The difference in boxing is that the negatives are so naked, so visceral, because at the end of the day it’s just two men, at center ring, shedding blood and sweat for the honor of victory.

    Don’t let the negatives be too distracting.

    The first decade of the twenty-first century had just as much its share of fantastic as any time before it.

    Boxing in the early 2000s saw an explosion of interest in Europe, record wealth in lower weight divisions, and megastars emerging in almost every part of the sports sometimes regionalized landscape. [Click Here To Read More]
  • the mesiah
    I'M GOD GIFTED!
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 2290
    • 87
    • 61
    • 15,639

    #2
    Cliff has come off with some aight lists , but just think he Dropped the ball on the middleweight list.should have had walker smith jr at his numero UNO, he is Reason why they made a pound for pound list to this day.. As long as it ain't Ronnie or Lyle making the list cuz everyone will know who will be their number 1..

    Comment

    • dr.archives
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Jan 2005
      • 425
      • 9
      • 3
      • 6,744

      #3
      Wow, when you see a list of those fighters who didn’t make the top 25 it reminds you of how many great fighters there were this past decade. It is surprising that some of those guys aren't on the list but the reasoning makes sense.

      Comment

      • lynchy
        I The SugarMan Incarnate
        • Nov 2007
        • 47
        • 3
        • 0
        • 6,123

        #4
        get your facts straight

        there was a stronger case for losing to felix sturm
        oscar de la hoya never lossed to felix sturm get your facts straight
        Last edited by lynchy; 01-07-2010, 04:07 PM. Reason: forgot

        Comment

        • Fenom
          No Ceilings
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2008
          • 2663
          • 133
          • 77
          • 9,305

          #5
          Originally posted by lynchy4664
          oscar de la hoya never lossed to felix sturm get your facts straight
          haha, its called sarcasm genius. The records dont show it but he lost that fight.

          smh.. simpleton.

          Comment

          • ChopperRead
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 4418
            • 170
            • 125
            • 4,609

            #6
            Personally, I'd put Vitali in. His comeback after almost four years out is amazing, considering that he's barely lost a round in four fights against fighters who combined had only two losses amongst the four of them at the time he fought them. Peter was supposed to be the savior of the heavyweight division, Gomez was a respected fighter who had a great run at cruiserweight and only one loss over an impressive career, and Arreola and Johnson were both unbeaten top prospects.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP