*******s, so which reason was it?

[LAPIDA]

For him losing the Morales fight


The Blood Test

The Gloves

The Cut

Took him lightly

The Socks

Forgot the PEDs.


I cant keep up with the excuses so which one was it *******s?

The cut.

Now i ask you, what is the reason why Mayweather have zero losses?

Be honest in your answer and avoid being a nuthugger please.

[Anabolism]

For him losing the Morales fight


The Blood Test

The Gloves

The Cut

Took him lightly

The Socks

Forgot the PEDs.


I cant keep up with the excuses so which one was it *******s?

pacquiao was better then a weight drained morales i agree

exactly, fighters are weaker when weight drained.. and now that pacquiao has moved up several weight classes, hes stronger

[xcaret v2]

The cut.

Now i ask you, what is the reason why Mayweather have zero losses?

Be honest in your answer and avoid being a nuthugger please.

he has zero losses cause no one has beaten him.... im being honest

[rocky_balboa23]

im telling you, these *******s are ***en ******ed, who the *** puts a tattoo of a boxer? LMFAO.... and now that he gotten exposed, hes regretting the **** out of it..

you are the ******ed one here..GOTH..

[toyi]

[xcaret v2]

you are the ******ed one here..GOTH..

let me guess, you think gatti is an ATG..

[MexicanMauler]

I believe he began taking them after the first Morales fight.

He couldn't hurt him in the first fight, but in the 2nd and third he was devastating him with the same punches... its a shame.

[LAPIDA]

he has zero losses cause no one has beaten him.... im being honest

I think the correct sentence should have been: He has zero losses because no cherry-picked opponents have beaten him yet.

True. He was a like a monster against corrales but after that nothing. Compare that to the resume of Pacman and it will belittle his reputation. If Mayweather would fight the same fighters that Pacman faced, i think that zero would be non-existing anymore.

[goldenglove2]

I believe he began taking them after the first Morales fight.

He couldn't hurt him in the first fight, but in the 2nd and third he was devastating him with the same punches... its a shame.

how do you sleep at night?

[rod_serrs]

I think the correct sentence should have been: He has zero losses because no cherry-picked opponents have beaten him yet.

True. He was a like a monster against corrales but after that nothing. Compare that to the resume of Pacman and it will belittle his reputation. If Mayweather would fight the same fighters that Pacman faced, i think that zero would be non-existing anymore.

No disrespect but Mayweather beats everyone on Pacs list as well. Not that it isn't a good list but the notable names would go down to Mayweather as well. In fact several have: ODLH, Marquez, Hatton. The notable names that haven't would not have beaten Mayweather anyway. Barrera, Morales at 130 would not have beaten him nor would David Diaz at 135. Cotto may have done better against Mayweather, but still probably falls via UD. Both of these guys are great in their own way, only difference is based on strength of opponents Pacs easily outshines Mayweather. As a Mayweather fan he needs to pick up the pace and opposition. As a Pacquiao fan if Mayweather falls through I'd like to see him face the Berto/Mosely winner.(Prefer Mosely to add another HoF to his list)