Comments Thread For: Mayweather Will Have To Drop Demands To Get Pacquiao

[jetgeomcx]

Yes. Mayweather would have to drop their demands for a more stringent anti-doping testings and stick with the already practiced NSAC procedures in exchange for Pacman dropping his defamation lawsuits. In return, GBP also retains their stake for every fight of Pacman and the fight pushes through on March 13.

the circus clowns (mayweathers) and the court jesters (gbp) will have to vow down to the (p4p) king..... and the show will go on.

they should all do.....coz they will lose more than manny.

[DocG]

WHO the **** are you? If you have noticed a few names in my sig... maybe you would have noticed they got "dinged" for the use of some sort of "drug" that got them either busted or accused at one point.

YES, I have been a fan of in depth testing for a long time now. Especially to prove what is really being taken aka REAL PEDS, steroid asthma inhalants, weed what ever the case may be.

I'm a fan of the sport, a sport that results with a NC because someone was using "something" after the fact is unacceptable. What Mayweather is "requesting" is NOT that big of a deal....... but since Mayweather is involved some of you vagina's get all sensitive......

Put your vagina away and look past the two names that are supposed to fight. Lets promote a fair and clean sport that involves fighting in a ring, not in court.

Got a few question for you........

1. How long does a random drug blood or urine test results are made public?

2. Do you think a random blood test taken within 1 month, especially a blood test taken 1 day before a fight can produce the "results" immediately and will stop a fight from happening if one is "positive" for PEDs?

3. Don't you think a blood test taken immediately after a fight can detect and is a better test for PEDs?

[Toxic]

Got a few question for you........

1. How long does a random drug blood or urine test results are made public?

2. Do you think a random blood test taken within 1 month, especially a blood test taken 1 day before a fight can produce the "results" immediately and will stop a fight from happening if one is "positive" for PEDs?

3. Don't you think a blood test taken immediately after a fight can detect and is a better test for PEDs?

He's just pretending. He can't answer that.

[jetgeomcx]

on-line poll

by the Los Angeles Times...

who among the four primary figures in the on-going rift should be blamed. – Pacquiao, Mayweather, Arum and Mayweather’s promoters and managers -

as of noontime Wednesday:

Mayweather = 5,841 votes (72 percent)
floyd's handlers = 1,537 (19 percent).
Pacquiao = 550 votes (7 percent)
Arum = 213 (3percent)

[Vasyl’s dad]

WHO the **** are you? If you have noticed a few names in my sig... maybe you would have noticed they got "dinged" for the use of some sort of "drug" that got them either busted or accused at one point.

YES, I have been a fan of in depth testing for a long time now. Especially to prove what is really being taken aka REAL PEDS, steroid asthma inhalants, weed what ever the case may be.

I'm a fan of the sport, a sport that results with a NC because someone was using "something" after the fact is unacceptable. What Mayweather is "requesting" is NOT that big of a deal....... but since Mayweather is involved some of you vagina's get all sensitive......

Put your vagina away and look past the two names that are supposed to fight. Lets promote a fair and clean sport that involves fighting in a ring, not in court.

Prove it then.


Btw, if the standards are subpar, how did those other guys get caught to make a fight a NC?

hmmm......

[WESS]

Prove it then.


Btw, if the standards are subpar, how did those other guys get caught to make a fight a NC?

hmmm......

that was after the fact homie. I'm talking about testing pre-fight before there is a KO in the first round with a NC. So yes the standards are SUBPAR because they need to be done pre fight not post fight. Say Briggs was really taking PEDS and killed the guy, THEN after the fact he was busted. A lot of good that does. Far fetched but you do see the flaws right?

Same for a lot of cases. Its always after the fact. I don't get WHY its such a big deal to test at random before a fight. Does Mayweather really piss that many people off?

If this was Pac asking Mayweather to take these tests and Floyd refused there would be outrage! Everyone would say he was ducking Pac and ducking a tests because HE was taking something and don't act like that wouldn't be the case because know damn well it would happen and if that was the case i would be backing Pac just as I'm backing Mayweather.

Don't forget now, Pacs ONE of my favorite fighters.....

[WESS]

Got a few question for you........

1. How long does a random drug blood or urine test results are made public?

2. Do you think a random blood test taken within 1 month, especially a blood test taken 1 day before a fight can produce the "results" immediately and will stop a fight from happening if one is "positive" for PEDs?

3. Don't you think a blood test taken immediately after a fight can detect and is a better test for PEDs?

For the amount of money that boxing generates, I'm sure they would get the necessary times and workers needed and would plan it accordingly to get the results. Obviously if a certain test takes longer than 12-48 hours they wouldn't do the test fight night (which I personally don't think is right) now would they?

If you "think" long enough I'm sure you could have answered the question yourself.