Why is floyd not getting any awards?

[Mr. Copycat]

WHY IS FLOYD NOT GETTING ANY AWARDS?

There's only one person giving Floyd the funfare and accolade he wants. It would not be an exaggeration to say that the writers and awarding bodies are unanimous in giving Pacquiao almost all the recognitions and awards, with one exception.

That exception is Floyd himself. Floyd cries out aloud, he is no.1. But fotunately, Floyd is all alone giving an award to himself. Pathetic. The greatest Ducker of all times, thats one of the awards Floyd should get. If a parody of awards will be made, Floyd will, in contrast, corner all insults in the boxing world.

And everybody knows that.

[Liar]

Just came out of retirement and had only one fight.

[Joeyzagz]

Awards are for 5th graders, handicapped people, Autistic children and ******s. We give these individuals awards so they can feel just as important as the competant people.

I dont want to get too far off subject here but basically it boils down to: Floyd fans talk about Floyd and Pac fans talk about Floyd even more. So the powers that be must give awards to Pacquiao so he can seem just as important as his counterpart.

Thats why.

[TheAuthority]

Awards are for 5th graders, handicapped people, Autistic children and ******s. We give these individuals awards so they can feel just as important as the competant people.

These "individuals" ARE just as important as the "competant" people.

[hugh grant]

This is why PBF ducks fights, or makes the fights he has as easy as he can make them so that he can win. Like choosing the weight, country he fights in and has words with the referee to protect him before the fight. He dont care about what people think of him. It is only important what PBF thinks of himself.

PBF thinks hes the greatest boxer who ever lived. He will continue to tell himself that, because no one else will. So he has to give himself a helping hand.

[Pullcounter]

Awards are for 5th graders, handicapped people, Autistic children and ******s. We give these individuals awards so they can feel just as important as the competant people.

hm... then I wonder why some *****s tried so hard to make the argument that floyd was fighter of the decade. these *****s even tried to bend the rules on counting so that 2010 was included in the first decade of of the 2000s.

[jqSide]

I don't put too much weight on these awards. Awarding bodies as comprised of people just like you and me. They don't know any better especially when it comes to boxing, which is a subjective sport. Having seen hundreds of fights doesn't mean anything. Oh I have heard a lot of loudmouthed know-it-alls predict fights and turned out to be wrong. You'd laugh how they profusely try to explain why it didn't happen the way they predicted it.

Bottom line: Anything can happen in a fight between Pac and Floyd.