All drama aside, what is wrong with a blood test in the locker room after the fight?

[Mike Hawk]

he amount of blood taken is so small it will have zero effect on performance," said Dr. Gary Wadler, the World Anti-Doping Agency chairman of the Prohibited List Committee. "It's really inconsequential when you take into account the total blood volume in the human body. It's not a valid argument."



/Thread

can you say for sure that pac's "NO" is because of the amount of blood drawn alone?

and valid argument for what really...an argument for something that was asked for extra......it shouldn't even be an argument in the first place....goes back to why prove an argument when there is nothing wrong with doing it after the fight

[RedWhiteBlue]

All drama aside, what is wrong with a blood test in the locker room after the fight?

Im not sure why GBP does not even care about a test right after the fight.

[deuce_drop]

I don't see no problem in that at all......as well as the RANDOM one's BEFORE the fight!!....this is all from BOTH sides.....I don't support either side on this one!!

i'm starting to feel the same way about things, but i still get caught up in the guilty until proven innocent thing, still works the nerves a bit.

but the lack of real negotiation or the awareness to the public of what is really going on is total bullmess.

[Spray_resistant]

Before a fight do you really want to be bothered with some un-necessary BS when they could do it some other time?

No, but not after either.

[Mike Hawk]

Im not sure why GBP does not even care about a test right after the fight.

huh? whos team are you on? lol

No, but not after either.

why is before more logical than after.

so you'd exchange

before:
possibly hindering training concentration/potential

for

after:
just in case......just in case some gets seriously hurt, they dont have to deal with getting blood at the HOSPITAL where this person is being treated for injuries.