Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

3 blood tests, random urinalysis in 2 months!!!!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Damn numbskulls, I swear. The solution is simple. Regarding something that the NSAC oversees like drug testing, a petition is required. Why the hell not have Mayweather and co. gone to the NSAC with the petition? Pacquiao said he'll do whatever the NSAC asks of him. File the damn petition. It's simple as that!

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by 2npac View Post
      Damn numbskulls, I swear. The solution is simple. Regarding something that the NSAC oversees like drug testing, a petition is required. Why the hell not have Mayweather and co. gone to the NSAC with the petition? Pacquiao said he'll do whatever the NSAC asks of him. File the damn petition. It's simple as that!
      totally! it was clear from the onset that pac will never bend over Mayweather Athletic Commission

      but hey instead of going about it the proper and civilized way...well, we already know what they did!

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by johncods View Post
        How the hell is that not enough??, thats above and beyond the normal testing... Pac has got to be a gutsy, ballsy ******ed mother****er to try to cheat in one of the biggest fight in boxing history where the microscope is on it and on him.. And they are ****in assuming a guy who has no history of cheating to take illegal substances in a 30 day window WTF?? If they we're serious about the fight they should be willing to take comprises for their ****** demands.. but i guess their eyes are set on matthew hatton..
        Sounds good to me. Anyone who has a problem with this is just a certified Pac hater who's more interested in "exposing" him as a cheat than actually getting this fight done. Do you have a source?

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Allucard View Post
          the blood tests need to be random too.
          "In June 2003, WADA’s Executive Committee accepted the results of an independent report stating that urine tests alone can be used to detect the presence of recombinant EPO. This report, requested by WADA’s stakeholders and commissioned by the Agency to evaluate the validity of urinary and blood tests for detecting the presence of recombinant EPO, concluded that urinary testing is the only scientifically validated method for direct detection of recombinant EPO." While this report also "recommended that urine testing be used in conjunction with blood screening for a variety of reasons, [like] ...cost savings of performing blood screening prior to testing urine." nothing is mentioned about blood testing being "necessary" nor for blood testing needing to be "random." - Word Anti Doping Agency, 2006

          "In August 2008, the United States ratified the 2005 UNESCO International Convention against Doping in Sport treaty, which incorporates the essential provisions of the WADA Code. This action,however,does not establish a legally enforceable obligation for Congress to enact federal legislation requiring US professional sports leagues and governing bodies to adopt or comply with the WADA Code, which permits (but does not require) blood testing to establish a doping violation." link

          Comment

          Working...
          X
          TOP