Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Would be take a criminal's word? Floyd sr

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Would be take a criminal's word? Floyd sr

    I don't get it.

    In real life, if we had to choose who to believe, between let's say, a criminal and a normal average joe...you would believe the criminal? I wouldn't.

    Now just because a ex-con starts making false accusations about pacman then everybody (those gullible enough) starts thinking negatively.

    Sorry but manny pacquiao had a test 24 days before the fight vs hatton so he clearly doesn't have a problem with testing 30 days b4 fights.

    What he clearly does have a problem with is being singled out for 'extra tests' beyond what is normally required.

    Now if you make manny take extra random tests...make it a rule of thumb for everybody else in boxing. Otherwise i can see how manny will get pissed off because he isn't being treated fairly. He is being treated as a criminal which is totally wrong.

    Bottom line...don't trust ex-cons.

  • #2
    typo: would you take a criminal's word

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Xercen View Post
      I don't get it.

      In real life, if we had to choose who to believe, between let's say, a criminal and a normal average joe...you would believe the criminal? I wouldn't.

      Now just because a ex-con starts making false accusations about pacman then everybody (those gullible enough) starts thinking negatively.

      Sorry but manny pacquiao had a test 24 days before the fight vs hatton so he clearly doesn't have a problem with testing 30 days b4 fights.

      What he clearly does have a problem with is being singled out for 'extra tests' beyond what is normally required.

      Now if you make manny take extra random tests...make it a rule of thumb for everybody else in boxing. Otherwise i can see how manny will get pissed off because he isn't being treated fairly. He is being treated as a criminal which is totally wrong.

      Bottom line...don't trust ex-cons.
      is he a criminal or a ex-con?!?.....ex means former or prior.....the ex-champ can't be seen as the champ anymore......of course we can call him champ but outta respect.......so I guess you callin' Sr. a criminal outta DISRESPECT!!....as far as your bottom line goes, ex-cons are what they are because of human actions!!......NOT human nature!!......you can CHANGE human actions, NOT human nature!!

      Comment


      • #4
        the judge for this lawsuit will just laugh when the credible witnesses are presented in court like the ex convicts and drug traffickers ....LOL

        easy money for pac. LOL

        Comment

        Working...
        X
        TOP