"HGH can't be found through blood" Freddie Roach

[The Underboss]

Pac is getting more doomed and doomed each day it passes.

[Doctor_Tenma]

Pac is getting more doomed and doomed each day it passes.

You see the 2005 thread?

[PirateGorilla]

You said "Think again dumb fuck!". But you didn't disprove the fact that HGH can't be tested in blood. You = Epic Fail.

Governing bodies and U.S. pro leagues have long sought a test that doesn't require blood to detect HGH, a synthetic hormone that aids in recovery and bolsters muscle growth. Even with the blood test, no prominent athlete has tested positive for HGH. Former track and field star Marion Jones and some baseball players, including New York Yankees pitcher Andy Pettitte, have admitted using it.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/2008-07-22-hgh-urine-test_N.htm

[Doctor_Tenma]

Governing bodies and U.S. pro leagues have long sought a test that doesn't require blood to detect HGH, a synthetic hormone that aids in recovery and bolsters muscle growth. Even with the blood test, no prominent athlete has tested positive for HGH. Former track and field star Marion Jones and some baseball players, including New York Yankees pitcher Andy Pettitte, have admitted using it.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/2008-...ine-test_N.htm

That's 7/23/2008

Check this out,

http://www.nanotech-now.com/news.cgi?story_id=34507

September 1st, 2009.

Abstract:
There is a new and promising HGH urine test that was developed at George Mason University. The new test uses nanotechnology to bind and amplify HGH in urine so that it may be detectable for a longer period of time. Blood screening can only detect HGH taken within the previous 24 to 48 hours. Nanotechnology may allow urine detection out to that two-week range.


Urine is better in some cases. Doesn't change the fact that it's "RANDOMIZING" it that matters.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

freddie dont know **** about drug testing, why is he talking?

urine and blood tests are equivalent.

lol wut??????

[PirateGorilla]

That's 7/23/2008

Check this out,

http://www.nanotech-now.com/news.cgi?story_id=34507

September 1st, 2009.

Abstract:
There is a new and promising HGH urine test that was developed at George Mason University. The new test uses nanotechnology to bind and amplify HGH in urine so that it may be detectable for a longer period of time. Blood screening can only detect HGH taken within the previous 24 to 48 hours. Nanotechnology may allow urine detection out to that two-week range.


Urine is better in some cases. Doesn't change the fact that it's "RANDOMIZING" it that matters.

From my understanding this problem is over random blood test and not urine. How does that support the random blood test, it's basically saying that urine testing is better than blood testing and at a longer time range.

[MidnightSpecial]

You see the 2005 thread?

yo what did Kevin and Webb get banned for?

[overlordbox]

You said "Think again dumb fuck!". But you didn't disprove the fact that HGH can't be tested in blood. You = Epic Fail.

nor did you prove it can't be tested in blood!

im assuming you didn't read the whole interview with roach, did you?
the interview says that there is a way to detect HGH! this thread is a fail!
and if it can't be detected through blood, what the point of a blood test then? epic fail for floyd and his *****s!

you fail to provide sources that's a fail for you too!
and since you fail to read this part that's another fail for you!

It is not simple to use HGH for few weeks before the fight. It is troublesome. When using HGH the body also needs more thyroid hormones, insulin, corticosteroids, gonadotropins, estrogens and what a surprise androgens and anabolic steroids. This is also the reason why HGH, when taken alone, is considerably less effective and can only reach its optimum effect by the additive intake of steroids, thyorid hormones, and insulin, in particular.1 These other drugs can be detected by the urine test then NSAC urine test is already enough for this.

[Doctor_Tenma]

From my understanding this problem is over random blood test and not urine. How does that support the random blood test, it's basically saying that urine testing is better than blood testing and at a longer time range.

Look all the way at the bottom, I said in some cases it's better.

[Doctor_Tenma]

nor did you prove it can't be tested in blood!

im assuming you didn't read the whole interview with roach, did you?
the interview says that there is a way to detect HGH! this thread is a fail!
and if it can't be detected through blood, what the point of a blood test then? epic fail for floyd and his *****s!

you fail to provide sources that's a fail for you too!
and since you fail to read this part that's another fail for you!

It is not simple to use HGH for few weeks before the fight. It is troublesome. When using HGH the body also needs more thyroid hormones, insulin, corticosteroids, gonadotropins, estrogens and what a surprise androgens and anabolic steroids. This is also the reason why HGH, when taken alone, is considerably less effective and can only reach its optimum effect by the additive intake of steroids, thyorid hormones, and insulin, in particular.1 These other drugs can be detected by the urine test then NSAC urine test is already enough for this.

You're right but listen,

Who is more likely to pass a drug test,

Person who has to take a scheduled test?

or

Person getting tested randomly?

So in the end, NSAC ain't ****.