I think it's interesting that the NSAC has been so quiet on this matter. Mayweather's, Schaefer's and GBP's actions is a blatant slap in the face to NSAC and all of boxing. They're pretty much calling into question the validity of all boxing bouts, by saying the NSAC's policy is insufficient. Let's not forget, Mayweather makes his home in Vegas, and he's challenging the outright boxing authority of the state he has to fight in? Not a good look.
Now let me ask you Mayflowers (blind fans motivated by hate and jealousy, not unlike *******s) this.
If the NSAC was good enough for his first 40 bouts, then why the sudden change of heart?
Also, if GBP is all about challenging boxing, and taking it a step forward for the good of the sport, where was this nobility when their own fighter, Sugar Shane, also VP of GBP, was on drugs?
Now let me ask you Mayflowers (blind fans motivated by hate and jealousy, not unlike *******s) this.
If the NSAC was good enough for his first 40 bouts, then why the sudden change of heart?
Also, if GBP is all about challenging boxing, and taking it a step forward for the good of the sport, where was this nobility when their own fighter, Sugar Shane, also VP of GBP, was on drugs?
Comment