Originally posted by WESS
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Mayweather, Golden Boy Hit Back at Pacquiao/Top Rank
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by jltsmae View PostAm not so sure if this mosley berto fight has a random blood test as what a lot of people wants (a clean drug free fight)!!! Can someone tell me pleasseeee...........
Am sure if anyone of those fighter decide to ask for it then am sure its good idea to entertain in the contract.
Comment
-
[QUOTE=switchsouthpaw;7111854]What exactly don't some of you guys about the fact that Mayweather "did" come in over the agreed upon weight before?
The 10 million dollar penalty, is meant to ensure that he doesn't repeat the same behavior twice, is that so difficult to understand? How is it unreasonable, if he is already guilty of doing it before?
What happened to "easy work"....they must have forgotten it's easy work with a blood test.[/QUOTE
Its not unreasonable at all. The amount is though. Regardless it is competely irrelevant....Mayweather agreed immedietely. Pac/roach were prob hoping he would not agree.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GRUSTLER View PostNOPE! Didn't see it.
Originally posted by AllEyesOpen View Postyou missed the smillie face, i was kidding but that is the faulty logic that alot of people are using, I just wanted to see if anybody got how ****** it actually sounds when you say it flat out.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BennyST View PostThere is a big difference between random and scheduled. Not that I think he is juicing but that's the biggest thing here.
It's not whether Pac will do it, but whether he will do random testing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wess View Postas if pac didn't think 10mil penalty wasn't going to be a "deal-ender"? Bad logic.
How would one know that by asking pac to take a random blood/drug test cause it to be a deal breaker??? That makes no sense. Asking for a random drug test in the contract is no different than asking for gloves sizes, ring sizes, location, money split, ppv rights etc. Its a contract, they can request what ever they want for this kind of money.
What people don't understand is that all they are doing is requesting, not accusing. Why is this hard to understand? Its no different than asking mayweather to pay a large unheard of fine for going over weight. Its a contract agreement that mayweather accepted. Why cant pac do the same without getting so sensitive?
Its nothing more than a blood test that many athletes get. What is pac's real reason for not wanting to take it? Pride is not the answer, scared of needles is not the answer, and a phobia is not the answer. For 50+ million nothing is an answer unless your hiding something which in the end would jeopardize the money and his career/legacy if busted.
You and many others fail to rationalize this just because mayweather's name is involved. Its not that hard to understand. This was supposed to be the biggest fight in the history of the sport and now its going to be ruined because pac doesn't want to give blood? His die-hard ******ed fans are now turning there back on the fight because of this????
If the shoe was on the other foot this would be an out rage......
ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding!!!1 ladies and gents we have a winner!!!!
Comment
-
[QUOTE=spinika7;7111945]Originally posted by switchsouthpaw View PostWhat exactly don't some of you guys about the fact that Mayweather "did" come in over the agreed upon weight before?
The 10 million dollar penalty, is meant to ensure that he doesn't repeat the same behavior twice, is that so difficult to understand? How is it unreasonable, if he is already guilty of doing it before?
What happened to "easy work"....they must have forgotten it's easy work with a blood test.[/QUOTE
Its not unreasonable at all. The amount is though. Regardless it is competely irrelevant....Mayweather agreed immedietely. Pac/roach were prob hoping he would not agree.
Lol christ...of course he agreed again because he did it before maybe? If he didn't do it before and was asked to pay 10 mill per each pound over, then you could cry foul, but guess what he did it before!!! Nevermind logic seems lost in this argument.
Let's make it real simple so a third grader can understand.
1) Guy A is guilty of doing something before and a request is made that he pay an excessive amount of money should he do it again, reasonable because he did it against Marquez. So Guy A accepts request based on his own prior history/PROOF.
2)Guy B says no to having additional blood tests dictated to him buy a guy who has asserted previously that he is on steroids, what's missing in Guy A's request?----->PROOFLast edited by switchsouthpaw; 12-28-2009, 09:40 PM.
Comment
Comment