Should boxing have random blood test for all fights?

[VERSION1 (V1)]

Why do you think they should?
Why do you think they shouldn't?

[AllEyesOpen]

Making it harder to cheat and gain an unfair advantage, why not? At least there would be no more questions or accusations against the most successful fighters. Why wouldn't anyone be okay with this?

[VERSION1 (V1)]

this is not about pacman or pbf do you guys think that boxing should have random blood testing for all fights?

[VERSION1 (V1)]

Making it harder to cheat and gain an unfair advantage, why not? At least there would be no more questions or accusations against the most successful fighter. Why wouldn't anyone be okay with this?

agreed 100%

[S.G.]

Yes. Simply because it means we'd catch more of the cheats and prevent even more from trying it.

[VERSION1 (V1)]

Yes. Simply because it means we'd catch more of the cheats and prevent even more from trying it.

green k...........

[daheadache]

Should be mandated by all commissions. Champions stripped by councils for not obliging. F*** getting McCain to mediate pac/may negotiations, he needs to head up this effort.

[The Gambler1981]

The reason why they would not be able to do it for all fights is cost, it would be very expensive to do this for all fighters especially at the low end of the sport. Lesser testing at the low end of the sport is probably alright because cheating would most likely be caught by the lesser tests since the guys would not really have the backing to use the means to avoid getting caught by them. I would like it to be for the whole sport but I can see the cost making it really hard to implement across the board.

For high end fights (like TV fight cards) though I think the best means should be used since the cost can easily be covered.

[VERSION1 (V1)]

hey PanamaLewis why did you vote no

[Go Blue]

Yes, lets rid the sport of all cheaters.

1 Positive Test: 1 Year Ban

2nd Postive Test: Lifetime Ban, all wins turned to a NC.