Do you think pac will look guilty if.....

[daheadache]

Agreed.

Is it right? No.
Is it smart? Yes.

How can you say it's not right, but it's smart? Why justify something that's clearly wrong? Such a B move.

[Xcusemymood]

How can you say it's not right, but it's smart? Why justify something that's clearly wrong? Such a B move.

How am I justifying it? I said it was wrong if that was their intention.

Its smart business for Floyd to set himself up for an excuse or at least a rematch if he loses.

Has it crossed your mind that team Mayweather might actually believe that Pac is juicing?

[DonRon]

The only way Pac would look guilty is if Floyd knocks him out. Because if he was able to take Cotto's blows then he surely can take Soft Hands Mayfeather. But with or without PED's, Mayfeather isn't knocking anyone out.

[The Gambler1981]

This is pretty much why this was a terrible battle to pick. Once someone says no to the stricter drug testing it just opens up a whole can of worms for people to nit pick about.

As far as I can tell the only way to win this battle is to have not fought it but even if they fight and have the strictest drug testing, unless Manny looks like the fighter he has been (which would be very tough considering the type of fighter Floyd is) question will still be there or if the fight with normal drug testing and Manny beats the **** out of Floyd the question would still be there.

You can say it is wrong or unethical or whatever but this only really became such a huge issue because Manny said no in the first place.

[daheadache]

How am I justifying it? I said it was wrong if that was their intention.

Its smart business for Floyd to set himself up for an excuse or at least a rematch if he loses.

Has it crossed your mind that team Mayweather might actually believe that Pac is juicing?

I suppose, but who want's to having anything to do with a business like that?

[Xcusemymood]

The only way Pac would look guilty is if Floyd knocks him out. Because if he was able to take Cotto's blows then he surely can take Soft Hands Mayfeather. But with or without PED's, Mayfeather isn't knocking anyone out.

What sense does this make?

[Maidana vs Rios]

I suppose, but who want's to having anything to do with a business like that?

In an ideal world, you'd be right. But money talks. People will break bread with the devil if it means making a **** load of money.

[Xcusemymood]

This is pretty much why this was a terrible battle to pick. Once someone says no to the stricter drug testing it just opens up a whole can of worms for people to nit pick about.

As far as I can tell the only way to win this battle is to have not fought it but even if they fight and have the strictest drug testing, unless Manny looks like the fighter he has been (which would be very tough considering the type of fighter Floyd is) question will still be there or if the fight with normal drug testing and Manny beats the **** out of Floyd the question would still be there.

You can say it is wrong or unethical or whatever but this only really became such a huge issue because Manny said no in the first place.

Pretty much what Im getting at.

[daheadache]

In an ideal world, you'd be right. But money talks. People will break bread with the devil if it means making a **** load of money.

Pac's showing maybe not...

[Xcusemymood]

I suppose, but who want's to having anything to do with a business like that?

But what if the Mayweather camp actually believed Manny was juicing and thats why they asked for it?

I wholeheartedly believe when Sr. originally said what he said he believed what he said.(even if it was Sr. dumbass)

Theres no way to know what camp Mayweathers intentions were. More than likely they figured Manny would take the Olympic style tests. When he didnt they used it to their advantage.....