Arguello vs Aron Pryor should be ruled a 'No Contest'!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Now_Or_Never
    Banned
    • Dec 2009
    • 168
    • 19
    • 0
    • 224

    #1

    Arguello vs Aron Pryor should be ruled a 'No Contest'!

    Because Pannama was in the corner and the so called "black bottle" really did contain prohibited substances.
    Anyone who has seen the documentary 'Assault in the Ring' knows what im talking about, this is because Luis Resto admits at the end of the film that he really did know the gloves were tampered with.

    Not only that, he also admits there were times when Pannama would put tablets in the drinking water; the purpose being to expand the fighter's lungs thus giving more energy.

    Tell me, is it coincidence that Pryor got the energy from nowhere to knock Alexis out just after he drunk from the different bottle? Most definitely not, he is a cheater to this day and Alexis should of won that fight.
  • ИATAS
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2007
    • 36648
    • 2,509
    • 1,953
    • 50,835

    #2
    No concrete evidence plus rusto is a crackhead now so his word isn't exactly respectable, even if it is the truth.

    Comment

    • Ekscape
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 2681
      • 141
      • 11
      • 9,606

      #3
      No proof... No one cares anymore...

      Comment

      • Earl-Hickey
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2009
        • 29031
        • 2,832
        • 1,384
        • 297,750

        #4
        others have said it, but there is no proof, you can't retrospectivley change a result with no evidence. Arguello took the loss without crying about it, who cares, they are both legends.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP