Anyone else thing the Pac vs Malanaggi fight is useless???

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Trinidad Jr.
    Banned
    • Dec 2009
    • 393
    • 11
    • 2
    • 534

    #21
    you guys give mayweather a hard time for mentioning matthew hatton ... oh but sure as **** if pacquiao wants to fight paul mallanagi a guy who couldnt knock out a cat GO ALL FOR IT!

    Comment

    • Bigchill79
      Interim Champion
      • Jul 2004
      • 730
      • 13
      • 0
      • 6,847

      #22
      If Pacquiao agrees to fight Malignaggi it'll be hypocrisy of the highest order. Malignaggi is 100 % convinced Pac is on steroids, PBF only sceptical

      Comment

      • Marduke
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2007
        • 1130
        • 30
        • 10
        • 7,308

        #23
        Originally posted by Bigchill79
        If Pacquiao agrees to fight Malignaggi it'll be hypocrisy of the highest order. Malignaggi is 100 % convinced Pac is on steroids, PBF only sceptical
        Look up the word Hypocrite because I think you're confused.

        It's hypocritical of Malignaggi to not request Olympic style testing if he thinks Pacman is on something.

        But Pacquaio never said he refuses to fight Mayweather because of the allegations.

        So it's not hypocritical at all for Pacquiao to literally murder Malignaggi in the ring.

        Comment

        • Ekscape
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 2681
          • 141
          • 11
          • 9,606

          #24
          Originally posted by Marduke
          Uh, but Bradley said he would fight with just the regular tests.

          Why do haters insist on repeating the same WRONG information?
          Actually in some senses you are wrong... Bradley said he wouldnt care about the test but Gary Shaw, HIS PROMOTOR, says otherwise... Gary Shaw says he wouldnt put Bradley in the ring without Pacquiao taking the blood test... So what Bradley thinks or cares about doesnt mean **** if he promotor says otherwise

          Comment

          • AceNguyen
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Mar 2008
            • 605
            • 25
            • 4
            • 6,704

            #25
            Paulie has already lost to Pac's last two victims quite brutally. I don't even like the triangle theory, but how would they sell the fight at all? Because Paulie split wins against a feather-fisted lightweight? Just a weird fight all the way around...they'd have to spin some crazy **** to make fans the least bit interested.

            Pac must fight Mayweather or Bradley next...those are fights that boxing fans would love to see against elite opponents.

            Comment

            • Weebler I
              El Weeblerito I
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 31092
              • 1,459
              • 1,648
              • 54,550

              #26
              Originally posted by Marduke
              Uh, I think you're mixing up Diaz's.

              Pacquiao never fought Juan Diaz.

              He fought David Diaz, who Malignaggi has never fought.
              apols, my mistake. I thought Pac faced Juan Diaz. I think the latter is a very exciting little fighter and I prefer watching fighters of his style but Paulie did a good job on him and deserves credit.

              Whatever happens tho Pac beats Paulie and I guess that's what many people are unhappy about, imo a Foreman or Judah fight is more interesting but Pac/Paulie isn't a bad match-up.

              Comment

              • Bigchill79
                Interim Champion
                • Jul 2004
                • 730
                • 13
                • 0
                • 6,847

                #27
                Originally posted by Marduke
                Look up the word Hypocrite because I think you're confused.

                It's hypocritical of Malignaggi to not request Olympic style testing if he thinks Pacman is on something.

                But Pacquaio never said he refuses to fight Mayweather because of the allegations.

                So it's not hypocritical at all for Pacquiao to literally murder Malignaggi in the ring.

                If have the feeling Malignaggi doesnt have the same bargaining clout as Mayweather. I could be wrong.

                Comment

                • jqSide
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 5218
                  • 550
                  • 166
                  • 11,252

                  #28
                  Anyone else think the Pac vs Malanaggi fight is useless?

                  It's totally useless, assuming it's the replacement for the Pac vs Floyd fight. I won't even hear or read anything about it if it ever materializes. Arum should stop rushing into things, be more discreet in his negotiations and not treat the Pacman as if he's just handling a one-hit wonder. He might as well let the Pacman have his long vacation.

                  Comment

                  • 72-10
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 209
                    • 4
                    • 0
                    • 6,492

                    #29
                    I'm not the least bit interested in seeing Pac beat the grease of Paulie's hair. I think it's just a tactical ploy by Arum.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP