They will allow any person accusing them of anything, to take control of their life I guess.
I personally, don't believe in such nonsense. If you're going to accuse me of anything, you'd better have some incredible facts to back up those claims before I even entertain the thought of being tested, searched or probed.
If people are so quick to judge based on one persons word, it shows how gullible they can be.
Pac is on PED's.
Hes avoiding RANDOM testing like a mutha****a.......why?
Maybe he doesn't want to have an embarrassing procedure conducted on him when he has never been accused of or tested positive before. Would you want security looking up your ass after being strip searched with a flashlight and Popsicle stick if a fellow airline passenger said they wanted you to be strip searched for no reason other than satisfying their desire of watching your inconvenience?
Street Bully, stop fucking playing! So he doesn't like getting accused eh? and this is the way to go about it? If he was clean, he wouldn't have had a problem!
Money wise it's the biggest fight for both of them. Name one fighter who can get Pacquiao $40Mill other than Mayweather? and vice versa.
Legacy wise? you have to be kidding when you say it does much more for Mayweather than it does for Pacquiao. There's been 3 ways to beat Pacquiao, beating him a 4th time is nothing. Matter of fact, Marquez almost beat him twice. Beating Pacquiao is not a big deal, beating Mayweather is a big deal.
Legacy wise Floyd has more to gain in this fight than pac has.
Street Bully, stop fucking playing! So he doesn't like getting accused eh? and this is the way to go about it? If he was clean, he wouldn't have had a problem!
If the state of Nevada makes these tests mandatory for all, and Pacquiao refuses than he can go to hell, but why should be be subjected to partisan treatment based on the desire of a few men? Sure as hell doesn't seem fair to me.
If the state of Nevada makes these tests mandatory for all, and Pacquiao refuses than he can go to hell, but why should be be subjected to partisan treatment based on the desire of a few men? Sure as hell doesn't seem fair to me.
It wouldn't be fair if Mayweather wasn't up for the same test but because he is, THIS IS FAIR.
I'm not a judge, never been to law schol neither, but I do have abrain and I use common sense. Mr. Pacquiao had no case. He should drop this nonsense lawsuit-talk immediately.
1. He ain't got **** on Mayweayher Jr or GBP
2. He wasn't gonna do **** in the first place, all talk to protect his image.
Your common sense already has you accusing PAC of doing PED's.
And again, why did De La Liar have his article pulled off the websites ?? I never said **** about Mo**ey Mayweather, but, in the end ,it all comes out of Jr's pockets anyway.
Tweet
Comment