Manny Pacquiao = Marion Jones, Roger Clemens

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jrosales13
    undisputed champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 32632
    • 739
    • 763
    • 40,023

    #11
    Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
    Alot of people here are saying that Pacquiao can sue Mayweather Jr. for saying "The Philippines has the best performance enhancing drugs in the world". Don't understand how that works.
    I seriously doubt he has any case against Mayweather Jr... So if Pac does go through with it. I don't know how that is going to work at all.

    Now against Mayweather Sr... I was talking to Nate Campbell adviser and he made good points. That made me think that Pac does not have a case. But, then Killa Kali (I think) IMO made some valid points that made me think Pac does have a case. So I don't know how this is going to go down...

    Comment

    • Dondi33O
      Banned
      • Oct 2009
      • 1438
      • 78
      • 19
      • 1,664

      #12
      Originally posted by jrosales13
      I seriously doubt he has any case against Mayweather Jr... So if Pac does go through with it. I don't know how that is going to work at all.

      Now against Mayweather Sr... I was talking to Nate Campbell adviser and he made good points. That made me think that Pac does not have a case. But, then Killa Kali (I think) IMO made some valid points that made me think Pac does have a case. So I don't know how this is going to go down...
      There is a saying that says, "there is no bad publicity" but I think this is the exception to the rule.

      Comment

      • pac oww
        Banned
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • May 2009
        • 341
        • 12
        • 0
        • 466

        #13
        i agree.

        no good can come of this.

        Comment

        • jrosales13
          undisputed champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2008
          • 32632
          • 739
          • 763
          • 40,023

          #14
          Originally posted by Dondi33O
          There is a saying that says, "there is no bad publicity" but I think this is the exception to the rule.
          I am not going to argue with you there. But, only time would tell... If this fight gets done and is made for March 13... And, becomes a record breaker type of event. Then probably this whole controversy was the reason why. So who knows what happens. We will see...

          Comment

          • King411
            Banned
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 74
            • 2
            • 0
            • 107

            #15
            Pacquiao is the greatest boxer of all time, he has every right to reject being tested randomly. Floyd is a *****.

            Comment

            • Dondi33O
              Banned
              • Oct 2009
              • 1438
              • 78
              • 19
              • 1,664

              #16
              Originally posted by jrosales13
              I am not going to argue with you there. But, only time would tell... If this fight gets done and is made for March 13... And, becomes a record breaker type of event. Then probably this whole controversy was the reason why. So who knows what happens. We will see...
              Yeah, Your right on that. Money will be huge but legacy can become slightly tarnished.

              Comment

              • FightFreak
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 435
                • 14
                • 2
                • 6,558

                #17
                So w/o evidence, people are all guilty till they prove innocent right

                Why would you demand a person to prove he has not committed a crime when there has been no evidence that he has ever committed such a crime? What is their sole basis but the accusations of a convicted crackhead? And EVEN WHEN THERE IS EVIDENCE -- AS THERE IS NONE HERE BUT THE ACCUSATION OF A CONVICTED CRACKHEAD WHO HAPPENS TO BE THE OPPONENT"S FATHER -- SHOULD PEOPLE BE LOOKED UPON AS GUILTY UNTIL THEY PROVE THEMSELVES INNOCENT?

                The world is upside down: The innocent are guilty, the guilty are innocent, chickens are warriors, and warriors are chickens.

                GTFOH, you *****s

                Comment

                • MindBat
                  floyd gobbler
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jun 2006
                  • 16853
                  • 571
                  • 841
                  • 25,210

                  #18
                  It's very unfortunate that it may have to come down to this.

                  I'm sure GBP and Team Mayweather are not going to sit around twiddling their thumbs in anticipation of a lawsuit without preparation.

                  I sincerely hope that this is all drama and posturing to, as some say, "hype the fight". But those are serious allegations and speculations being thrown around.

                  A popular athlete's image is on the line whether it is a silly ploy or not.

                  Comment

                  • King411
                    Banned
                    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 74
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    • 107

                    #19
                    Originally posted by FightFreak
                    Why would you demand a person to prove he has not committed a crime when there has been no evidence that he has ever committed such a crime? What is their sole basis but the accusations of a convicted crackhead? And EVEN WHEN THERE IS EVIDENCE -- AS THERE IS NONE HERE BUT THE ACCUSATION OF A CONVICTED CRACKHEAD WHO HAPPENS TO BE THE OPPONENT"S FATHER -- SHOULD PEOPLE BE LOOKED UPON AS GUILTY UNTIL THEY PROVE THEMSELVES INNOCENT?

                    The world is upside down: The innocent are guilty, the guilty are innocent, chickens are warriors, and warriors are chickens.

                    GTFOH, you *****s
                    Yeah, i agree. Floyd is a *****. He doesn't have any right to ask Manny Pacquiao for anything.

                    Comment

                    • Kevin Jesus
                      Banned
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Apr 2009
                      • 7723
                      • 280
                      • 514
                      • 8,467

                      #20
                      Pacquiao should think twice about embroiling himself in a lawsuit that has to do with anything about steroids, it can end up in career ending without even getting hurt physically or anything. Just hurt his legacy like Barry Bonds, Rafael Palmeiro, Marion Jones, Shane Mosley, and many other steroid cases.

                      If anything, Pacquiao fans should thank Mayweather for backing off his USADA request because now Manny may back off from his lawsuit and the fight can move forward.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP