Somewhere down the line, the Mayweathers will counter and ask for some sort of test done on Manny, Since they have no proof. So in the end he'll have to do it anyway....
Somewhere down the line, the Mayweathers will counter and ask for some sort of test done on Manny, Since they have no proof. So in the end he'll have to do it anyway....
Is this a possible scenario?
No that is dumb. That's like asking a murder suspect for a blood sample because there was no blood at the scene of the crime.
You wanna accuse someone they're doing something wrong then it's up to you to prove it. Defendant doesnt have to do jack.
Somewhere down the line, the Mayweathers will counter and ask for some sort of test done on Manny, Since they have no proof. So in the end he'll have to do it anyway....
Is this a possible scenario?
possibly for a high profile case like this. child custody battles, divorces usually require drug testing for evidence.
That's one of the most funniest **** i've ever heard LOL. The judge is going to tell Manny,' We need to do some blood testing on you to proof that you're innocent". Manny is dead meat LOL.
The only proof Manny needs is his NSAC results from previous blood tests, which he passed 11 times.
manny is the one that needs to prove the comments were made with the direct attempt to damage him...which won't hold up because if they were made for him to loss income (damages) then why would floyd jr. agree to fight him if he passes a test he is willing to take also.
The only proof Manny needs is his NSAC results from previous blood tests, which he passed 11 times.
If Floyd is asking for USADA in his suit and the judge rules it, Manny will have to do it no matter how many times he's passed NSAC.
So in the end if Manny still has to go though these tests and wins, what does he really gain from this?
They both will have to pay hefty legal fees while this case is tied up.
Comment