Who's worse?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Thread Stealer
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2007
    • 9657
    • 439
    • 102
    • 17,804

    #1

    Who's worse?

    Most of the bickering is foolish, and probably (hopefully) won't matter anyway when both sides agree to a compromise, but which is worse?

    I stay away from taking sides on the flame wars, but what's worse?

    Saying there's no chance that Pacquiao is dirty and bringing up him passing tests as evidence, when even high-profile members of the NSAC (the strictest among boxing) acknowledge the flaws. Hell, even Flip Homansky said the only fighters who get caught are the ones who make mistakes and if you know what you're doing, you won't get caught.

    Or those who've already made up their mind that Manny is 100% guilty, when there's no evidence and he hasn't even been linked to any PED scandals either.
    2
    Those who say there's no way Pacquiao is dirty because he passes commission tests
    50.00%
    1
    Those who say Pacquiao is without a doubt guilty with no evidence, simply speculation
    50.00%
    1
    Last edited by Thread Stealer; 12-26-2009, 06:39 AM.
Working...
TOP