Most of the bickering is foolish, and probably (hopefully) won't matter anyway when both sides agree to a compromise, but which is worse?
I stay away from taking sides on the flame wars, but what's worse?
Saying there's no chance that Pacquiao is dirty and bringing up him passing tests as evidence, when even high-profile members of the NSAC (the strictest among boxing) acknowledge the flaws. Hell, even Flip Homansky said the only fighters who get caught are the ones who make mistakes and if you know what you're doing, you won't get caught.
Or those who've already made up their mind that Manny is 100% guilty, when there's no evidence and he hasn't even been linked to any PED scandals either.
I stay away from taking sides on the flame wars, but what's worse?
Saying there's no chance that Pacquiao is dirty and bringing up him passing tests as evidence, when even high-profile members of the NSAC (the strictest among boxing) acknowledge the flaws. Hell, even Flip Homansky said the only fighters who get caught are the ones who make mistakes and if you know what you're doing, you won't get caught.
Or those who've already made up their mind that Manny is 100% guilty, when there's no evidence and he hasn't even been linked to any PED scandals either.