Should Manny Pacquiao sue Team Mayweather for Slander? Official Poll!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DrewWoodside
    Lifestyle..Regular!
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2008
    • 9244
    • 317
    • 590
    • 16,453

    #1

    Should Manny Pacquiao sue Team Mayweather for Slander? Official Poll!

    Should Manny Pacquiao sue Team Mayweather for Slander? It is a fact that Pacquiao's name has been dragged through the mud and that he has been asked to undergo testing demands no other fighter has ever been required to endure. The only problem with him suing is it could ruin the mega fight, but put that aside for the purpose of the poll. Please discuss.
    94
    Yes.
    70.21%
    66
    No.
    29.79%
    28
  • mrsjt
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 139
    • 2
    • 0
    • 6,191

    #2
    i believe he should but i doubt he woud do it right now, maybe after the election.

    Comment

    • aether
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2006
      • 3337
      • 93
      • 59
      • 3,672

      #3
      as a boxing fan, i say don't sue cause it kills the fight.

      taking manny's point of view however, golden boy and people from floyd's camp certainly made it seem like manny is not willing to take the additional tests (which is not the case at all), and came out with statements that are damaging to his name.

      in conclusion, floyd and ellerbe are ****sexual lovers.

      Comment

      • DrewWoodside
        Lifestyle..Regular!
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jan 2008
        • 9244
        • 317
        • 590
        • 16,453

        #4
        Originally posted by aether
        as a boxing fan, i say don't sue cause it kills the fight.

        taking manny's point of view however, golden boy and people from floyd's camp certainly made it seem like manny is not willing to take the additional tests (which is not the case at all), and came out with statements that are damaging to his name.

        in conclusion, floyd and ellerbe are ****sexual lovers.
        (in response to Team Judah during Mosley/Judah Negotiations.) "Whatever tests they want them to take, Shane will submit to that. We are not going to do other tests than the Nevada commission requires. The fact is Shane is not a cheater and he does not need to be treated like one."

        ~ Richard Schaefer, March 2008

        Comment

        • z0jo
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 1094
          • 64
          • 56
          • 7,408

          #5
          I say sue the crackheads for all the're worth.

          Comment

          • aether
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2006
            • 3337
            • 93
            • 59
            • 3,672

            #6
            Originally posted by DrewWoodside
            (in response to Team Judah during Mosley/Judah Negotiations.) "Whatever tests they want them to take, Shane will submit to that. We are not going to do other tests than the Nevada commission requires. The fact is Shane is not a cheater and he does not need to be treated like one."

            ~ Richard Schaefer, March 2008
            yup... hypocrisy at its finest.

            you should have added "floyd and ellerbe are ****sexual lovers" in the poll options. that is my final stand on this issue

            Comment

            • Haglerwins
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2006
              • 2528
              • 90
              • 40
              • 9,195

              #7
              No. Waste of time. All of this stems from Floyd Sr.'s original video comment where he clearly states before he links Manny to roids that it is "his opinion". People keep forgetting that part. Now somebody on here tried to say an opinion can be slander when malice is involved, but I'd like to know how you prove with 100% certainty that the reason behind the opinion was to defame and not to expose something you legitimately feel isn't right.

              Comment

              • tibbar
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2006
                • 2725
                • 83
                • 83
                • 9,166

                #8
                sue them so theyll know theres limit to being outright funny and ******. make them responsible for their words.

                Comment

                • DrewWoodside
                  Lifestyle..Regular!
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2008
                  • 9244
                  • 317
                  • 590
                  • 16,453

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Haglerwins
                  No. Waste of time. All of this stems from Floyd Sr.'s original video comment where he clearly states before he links Manny to roids that it is "his opinion". People keep forgetting that part. Now somebody on here tried to say an opinion can be slander when malice is involved, but I'd like to know how you prove with 100% certainty that the reason behind the opinion was to defame and not to expose something you legitimately feel isn't right.
                  If you don't think all these demands and previous allegations by all things Mayweather have potentially slandered Pacquiao's name when he has been guilty of nothing.. Then you haven't been reading the press releases. My only issue would be a potential permanent road block for the megabout.

                  Comment

                  • SuckaPunch
                    One Lethal Punch
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Mar 2005
                    • 4377
                    • 540
                    • 1,757
                    • 25,230

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Haglerwins
                    Now somebody on here tried to say an opinion can be slander when malice is involved, but I'd like to know how you prove with 100% certainty that the reason behind the opinion was to defame and not to expose something you legitimately feel isn't right.
                    There are reasons why lawyers exist and get paid.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP