Lawsuit? How ****** are they?? LOL
Collapse
-
If JMM- Hatton doesnt happen, then JMM would be more likely for us than Hatton would. I think the only way that Hatton-JMM doesnt happen is if Hatton decides he only wants to fight a dummy for a farewell win. So if he wouldnt fight JMM even with all the money it would generate, then he sure wouldnt fight Nate for even less. So in that case a JMM fight would be more likely.
As for Pac, if I'm not mistaken the position of GBP is that if Pac fights ANY GBP fighter, then the testing is required. So what we think doesnt really matter. We have a contract that grants them certain rights, and they would be within their rights to take that position. Any promotional contract with any promoter basically grants them the right to approve or deny any opponent (other than mandos). But its a moot point anyways. If this falls out, no way Arum would match Pac with any GBP fighters anyways.....Comment
-
BTW, your logic sucks.Comment
-
Or, are you just regularly interesting in Jurisprudence and seem to have an affinity to rant the validity of legal cases pertaining to PACQUIAO.....
If anything,,,,Im speaking to you,,,,in the present,,,,negating your arguements, letting everyone see how ****** your points are....
In short....You're a jealous ***** that needs to find another nutsack to crawl under....Comment
-
What about a fight against Peterson? I don't remember if it was Anthony or Lamont who Nate didn't like. I was watching this youtube video and 2 Puerto rican guys have a show called p4p boxing. And, they went to Nate house and interviewed him. And, in that show Nate said he really wanted to fight one of the Peterson brothers. I can't remember which one though. And, it seem like Nate was really angry about it. Like if there is some bad blood there. Do you know what I am talking about?Comment
-
LOL... I didnt make this thread bitching and whining about a legal rambling that neither you or I is concerned,,,huh????
Or, are you just regularly interesting in Jurisprudence and seem to have an affinity to rant the validity of legal cases pertaining to PACQUIAO.....
If anything,,,,Im speaking to you,,,,in the present,,,,negating your arguements, letting everyone see how ****** your points are....
In short....You're a jealous ***** that needs to find another nutsack to crawl under....Comment
-
bull****. nobody outside of Pac and his team can say with certainty whether Pac is on the juice or not. Not me. Not you. And not Bradley either.Comment
-
LOL... I didnt make this thread bitching and whining about a legal rambling that neither you or I is concerned,,,huh????
Or, are you just regularly interesting in Jurisprudence and seem to have an affinity to rant the validity of legal cases pertaining to PACQUIAO.....
If anything,,,,Im speaking to you,,,,in the present,,,,negating your arguements, letting everyone see how ****** your points are....
In short....You're a jealous ***** that needs to find another nutsack to crawl under....Comment
-
I think that was about Anthony, when Nate was still at 135. Anthony had done an interview, maybe on ESPN if I remember correctly and had said some things about Nate that he didnt like. I dont remember exactly what it was, but it wasnt that big of a deal. It was more that the interview Nate did was only a day or 2 after Anthony's comments so it was still fresh in Nate's mind.......
What about the beef with Zab Judah? Is that all squashed now? Or what about making that fight? I really wanted to see that. It seemed like they didn't like each other.Comment
-
Exactly, The former head of the NSAC Dr goodman said herself that the NSAC test procedure is easy to get around by fighters, She even said the olympic drug testing procedure would be the only way to detect something, Now if you have nothing to hide why would you want to say no to a random test?Comment
Comment