Lawsuit? How ****** are they?? LOL

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kadyo's
    Grand Son
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2004
    • 23629
    • 2,648
    • 3,802
    • 56,474

    #141
    Originally posted by bigdognyc
    Oh no's....Is his father a crackhead too???

    Jeez,,,, I thought I left the '80s behind me...lol
    I read somewhere that he was being carried by his father inside their house when they were suddenly shot at by some hoods because of some drug deal that went wrong, I guess that was in the 80's but maybe he can clarify this issue. LOL

    Comment

    • jrosales13
      undisputed champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2008
      • 32632
      • 738
      • 763
      • 40,023

      #142
      Originally posted by OnePunch
      If JMM- Hatton doesnt happen, then JMM would be more likely for us than Hatton would. I think the only way that Hatton-JMM doesnt happen is if Hatton decides he only wants to fight a dummy for a farewell win. So if he wouldnt fight JMM even with all the money it would generate, then he sure wouldnt fight Nate for even less. So in that case a JMM fight would be more likely.

      As for Pac, if I'm not mistaken the position of GBP is that if Pac fights ANY GBP fighter, then the testing is required. So what we think doesnt really matter. We have a contract that grants them certain rights, and they would be within their rights to take that position. Any promotional contract with any promoter basically grants them the right to approve or deny any opponent (other than mandos). But its a moot point anyways. If this falls out, no way Arum would match Pac with any GBP fighters anyways.....
      What about a fight against Peterson? I don't remember if it was Anthony or Lamont who Nate didn't like. I was watching this youtube video and 2 Puerto rican guys have a show called p4p boxing. And, they went to Nate house and interviewed him. And, in that show Nate said he really wanted to fight one of the Peterson brothers. I can't remember which one though. And, it seem like Nate was really angry about it. Like if there is some bad blood there. Do you know what I am talking about?

      Comment

      • kadyo's
        Grand Son
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2004
        • 23629
        • 2,648
        • 3,802
        • 56,474

        #143
        Originally posted by OnePunch
        you're right. It's an ignorant statement. He said "He's not on sterioids". How on earth does he know that to be fact? Has he seen some test results that nobody else has seen? Nope. He's just looking for a payday same as everyone else.
        I knew it before hand that you'd disagree with tim LOLOL. Next time you see him in court, tell him what you just told me.

        BTW, your logic sucks.

        Comment

        • bigdognyc
          Banned
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 194
          • 26
          • 3
          • 380

          #144
          Originally posted by OnePunch
          I would want you to take an aids test too, because you kind of sound like a **** smoking sissy who is mad that your husband keeps smacking you around so you act like a tough guy on the internet to make yourself feel b
          LOL... I didnt make this thread bitching and whining about a legal rambling that neither you or I is concerned,,,huh????

          Or, are you just regularly interesting in Jurisprudence and seem to have an affinity to rant the validity of legal cases pertaining to PACQUIAO.....

          If anything,,,,Im speaking to you,,,,in the present,,,,negating your arguements, letting everyone see how ****** your points are....

          In short....You're a jealous ***** that needs to find another nutsack to crawl under....

          Comment

          • OnePunch
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2008
            • 9081
            • 1,295
            • 748
            • 2,453,131

            #145
            Originally posted by jrosales13
            What about a fight against Peterson? I don't remember if it was Anthony or Lamont who Nate didn't like. I was watching this youtube video and 2 Puerto rican guys have a show called p4p boxing. And, they went to Nate house and interviewed him. And, in that show Nate said he really wanted to fight one of the Peterson brothers. I can't remember which one though. And, it seem like Nate was really angry about it. Like if there is some bad blood there. Do you know what I am talking about?
            I think that was about Anthony, when Nate was still at 135. Anthony had done an interview, maybe on ESPN if I remember correctly and had said some things about Nate that he didnt like. I dont remember exactly what it was, but it wasnt that big of a deal. It was more that the interview Nate did was only a day or 2 after Anthony's comments so it was still fresh in Nate's mind.......

            Comment

            • kadyo's
              Grand Son
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2004
              • 23629
              • 2,648
              • 3,802
              • 56,474

              #146
              Originally posted by bigdognyc
              LOL... I didnt make this thread bitching and whining about a legal rambling that neither you or I is concerned,,,huh????

              Or, are you just regularly interesting in Jurisprudence and seem to have an affinity to rant the validity of legal cases pertaining to PACQUIAO.....

              If anything,,,,Im speaking to you,,,,in the present,,,,negating your arguements, letting everyone see how ****** your points are....

              In short....You're a jealous ***** that needs to find another nutsack to crawl under....
              hey doggie he's an expert. He's with nate campbell you know, a three belt lightweight champ. LOL

              Comment

              • OnePunch
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2008
                • 9081
                • 1,295
                • 748
                • 2,453,131

                #147
                Originally posted by kadyo
                I knew it before hand that you'd disagree with tim LOLOL. Next time you see him in court, tell him what you just told me.

                BTW, your logic sucks.

                bull****. nobody outside of Pac and his team can say with certainty whether Pac is on the juice or not. Not me. Not you. And not Bradley either.

                Comment

                • OnePunch
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2008
                  • 9081
                  • 1,295
                  • 748
                  • 2,453,131

                  #148
                  Originally posted by bigdognyc
                  LOL... I didnt make this thread bitching and whining about a legal rambling that neither you or I is concerned,,,huh????

                  Or, are you just regularly interesting in Jurisprudence and seem to have an affinity to rant the validity of legal cases pertaining to PACQUIAO.....

                  If anything,,,,Im speaking to you,,,,in the present,,,,negating your arguements, letting everyone see how ****** your points are....

                  In short....You're a jealous ***** that needs to find another nutsack to crawl under....
                  I started this thread because I went through this very same issue last year with my own attorneys, and I figured that people who had an open mind and could intelligently debate an issue might find it relevant. Obviously you are neither so why are you still here?

                  Comment

                  • jrosales13
                    undisputed champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 32632
                    • 738
                    • 763
                    • 40,023

                    #149
                    Originally posted by OnePunch
                    I think that was about Anthony, when Nate was still at 135. Anthony had done an interview, maybe on ESPN if I remember correctly and had said some things about Nate that he didnt like. I dont remember exactly what it was, but it wasnt that big of a deal. It was more that the interview Nate did was only a day or 2 after Anthony's comments so it was still fresh in Nate's mind.......
                    Oh ok, yea Nate seemed angry about the whole situation that day. He was going off.

                    What about the beef with Zab Judah? Is that all squashed now? Or what about making that fight? I really wanted to see that. It seemed like they didn't like each other.

                    Comment

                    • Ray*
                      Be safe!!!
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2005
                      • 44867
                      • 1,654
                      • 1,608
                      • 558,890

                      #150
                      Originally posted by OnePunch
                      you're right. It's an ignorant statement. He said "He's not on sterioids". How on earth does he know that to be fact? Has he seen some test results that nobody else has seen? Nope. He's just looking for a payday same as everyone else.


                      Exactly, The former head of the NSAC Dr goodman said herself that the NSAC test procedure is easy to get around by fighters, She even said the olympic drug testing procedure would be the only way to detect something, Now if you have nothing to hide why would you want to say no to a random test?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP