The limited knowledge of a poster we know really well.

[Iceta]

You guys wanna know who he is? Ch@mpboxPR. He said that Felix Sturm is a tougher fight for Pavlik than Paul Williams. Now we can debate who is ducking who when it comes to Pavlik and Williams. But this just goes to show that Ch@mp only follows certain boxers.

[struglerer]

ofcourse we follow "certain" boxers more......................

[project xxx1]

not sticking up for him but thats just his opinion

[Sicario]

Felix Sturm IS a tougher fight for Pavlik than PWilliams, Have you ever even seen Sturm fight?

[Toney Loc]

Um...Sturm is a tougher fight stylistically than Williams. Me thinks.

[Iceta]

Felix Sturm IS a tougher fight for Pavlik than PWilliams, Have you ever even seen Sturm fight?

He isn't that good. He got KOd by Castillejo. This just shows the ignorance of someone like Ch@mp.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

lol Thread Failed, you sure dont know ****!!

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

He isn't that good. He got KOd by Castillejo. This just shows the ignorance of someone like Ch@mp.

Cotto >>>> Mosley>>>>>>>Margarito>>>>>>Cotto

Styles make fights you idiot!!!!

[Iceta]

lol Thread Failed, you sure dont know ****!!

What is it I don't know? You mentioned this on a comments thread from the main page on a Pavlik-Williams story a couple days ago. I remember it vividly.

[southpaw_07]

Um...Sturm is a tougher fight stylistically than Williams. Me thinks.

That's actually spot on.
Sturm is not bringing the fight to Pavlik as Williams would do, Williams can stand there and brawl with Pavlik but Sturm prefers to stay on the outside and jab and pick his spots and then move away, it's a potentially tricky match up for Pavlik.