Olympic drug testing efforts attacked

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • josenoway
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2005
    • 2195
    • 95
    • 8
    • 8,612

    #11
    Nope, they are their own entity and not a branch. They adopted very similar protocols but procedures are not 100% identical.

    Comment

    • ThePunchingBag
      Rolling with the punches.
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 5766
      • 192
      • 55
      • 12,300

      #12
      Originally posted by IMDAZED
      You strive for the best - even when it isn't good. that's your answer.

      We can use this, which has loopholes...or we can use the standard NSAC test, which has holes the size of a crater.
      Unfortunately, Olympic testing is only the best in long term drug testing.

      A lot of the blood tests that they wanted Manny to undertake are only blood tests for long term chemical tracking. This is useful in the Olympics since athletes usually participate several times in the games, but since this is a one-time event most of those blood tests aren't necessary so they serve only to disturb and distract.

      Comment

      • ThePunchingBag
        Rolling with the punches.
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 5766
        • 192
        • 55
        • 12,300

        #13
        Originally posted by josenoway
        Nope, they are their own entity and not a branch. They adopted very similar protocols but procedures are not 100% identical.
        You are correct in that their protocols are the same, but the connection between the two goes even further.

        The USADA is legally associated to the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), through the WADA Anti-Doping Code, to which the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) is a signatory.

        All such tests were conducted in accordance with the protocols developed by WADA.

        As an agency with a direct relationship to WADA, the USADA has endorsed the principle that the defense of "mistake," as it may be advanced by an athlete in a positive doping test scenario, will be difficult to maintain.

        Comment

        • josenoway
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2005
          • 2195
          • 95
          • 8
          • 8,612

          #14
          "USADA will collect samples according to standards set forth by the IOC and WADA. USADA will follow its own drug testing and sample collection protocols even when these differ from those of the IF, the IOC, and WADA. All samples collected will be analyzed only by IOC accredited laboratories."

          But whatever. It's funny that some Pac nuthuggers will quote Victor Conte as a source, but another Pac nuthugger will attack Conte as a source. Heh.

          Comment

          • PrtyBoyDlicious
            OnePunchWonder
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Nov 2006
            • 500
            • 141
            • 78
            • 8,739

            #15
            Originally posted by ThePunchingBag
            [SIZE="4"]
            Why do the Mayweather's insist on using an agency riddled with loopholes?

            No surprise there. They are scared of Pacquiao and looking for a way out!

            Comment

            • goldenglove2
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Oct 2008
              • 2763
              • 54
              • 8
              • 8,954

              #16
              Originally posted by DLT
              Boxing is different though because there isnt a season like the other sports so you arent going to roid up when you arent training for a fight
              horrible post....

              Comment

              • ThePunchingBag
                Rolling with the punches.
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2009
                • 5766
                • 192
                • 55
                • 12,300

                #17
                Originally posted by josenoway
                "USADA will collect samples according to standards set forth by the IOC and WADA. USADA will follow its own drug testing and sample collection protocols even when these differ from those of the IF, the IOC, and WADA. All samples collected will be analyzed only by IOC accredited laboratories."

                But whatever. It's funny that some Pac nuthuggers will quote Victor Conte as a source, but another Pac nuthugger will attack Conte as a source. Heh.
                Yes you are right that some of the procedures differ from WADA, but the overwhelming majority are the same.

                Regardless, I'm sure the article applies to any drug agency related to the Olympics. When the leader of BALCO says you got a problem in your protocols, then you got a problem.

                Conte is a de****able man btw...

                Comment

                • norrin
                  Contender
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 402
                  • 30
                  • 58
                  • 6,852

                  #18
                  I don't get your point. What are you trying to say, prove, or disprove?

                  Comment

                  • IMDAZED
                    Fair but Firm
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2006
                    • 42644
                    • 1,134
                    • 1,770
                    • 67,152

                    #19
                    Originally posted by ThePunchingBag
                    Unfortunately, Olympic testing is only the best in long term drug testing.

                    A lot of the blood tests that they wanted Manny to undertake are only blood tests for long term chemical tracking. This is useful in the Olympics since athletes usually participate several times in the games, but since this is a one-time event most of those blood tests aren't necessary so they serve only to disturb and distract.
                    Olympic Testing is clearly better than the regulatory testing of the NSAC. Therefore - even if flawed - should replace it until even better testing is found. The chemists will always be ahead of those who test. But if the best is flawed that doesn't mean we settle for the worst.

                    Comment

                    • IMDAZED
                      Fair but Firm
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 42644
                      • 1,134
                      • 1,770
                      • 67,152

                      #20
                      Originally posted by norrin
                      I don't get your point. What are you trying to say, prove, or disprove?
                      He's saying that if this is bad, imagine how ****ty regular boxing tests are!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP