He should just smarten up and take the test. Even if he is doping, he should understand that it really wouldn't blemish his career or record to lose to Floyd Mayweather because we all know in our hearts that guy is the best Boxer alive. Mayweather has more to lose since he still has his 0 and his undefeated record is one of his biggest bragging rights.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Bradley Fight Would Require Olympic Testing on Pacquiao
Collapse
-
Originally posted by bigpoppapump View Postthe situation taking place with manny pacquiao is exactly what many feared would happen. As i previously reported on boxingscene.com, manny pacquiao's troubles will not end with floyd mayweather jr. If the camps representing pacquiao and mayweather do not reach an agreement with respect to the random olympic-style drug testing for their tentative march 13 bout - other potential opponents will make the same demands for the random olympic-style drug testing. [click here to read more]
Comment
-
Originally posted by Iceta View PostI'm a Cotto hater. I know. I can't be objective about anything. Hell, you Ricans accused Margarito of taking roids when there was nothing to back it up with. You just can't admit I'm right.
You are never right, you assume you are right in your little pathethic hating bubble!!!
Comment
-
-
So they now they have Pacquiao cornered, eh.
So now every promoter and fighter who wants to market themselves off the Pacquiao name is shouting about "olympic testing", throwing insults at the guy.
Just a couple of questions: Has Marquez, Malignaggi or even Mayweather ever done USADA testing. Or have they all done the testing procedures normal in pro boxing. Has any Golden Boy or Shaw fighter ever done USADA testing? Will they do USADA testing in their next fight if it is not against Pacquiao?
The answer to all these questions, of course, is a big no.
But now we have created a special lex Pacquiao, a rule that only applies for philippinoes who invade the country to beat up the local heroes.
How low can people go...?
Comment
Comment