How would you HONESTLY feel if PBF made Pac look like an amaetur boxer?

[jrosales13]

Genaro Hernandez
Diego Corrales
Arturo Gatti-not elite
Marquez-small

You think he made them look like amateurs? I thought he dominated them but I didn't think they looked like amateurs... I just think they lost shutouts....

[Shadows]

I'd be surprised. I think Pacquiao would be out of the fight by the 8th, but not looking like an amateur in process.

[Sweet Jesus]

You think he made them look like amateurs? I thought he dominated them but I didn't think they looked like amateurs... I just think they lost shutouts....

We just have different definitions on what defines looking like an amateur in the ring then.

[-EX-]

I would laugh and be a little suprised...

[JoeyNumbers]

I would give him the credit he deserves. He would be a master at outpointing people. I mean we kinda already know that.... but I think schooling Pac in that manner is harder than most people think. So I would be majorly impressed if he could accomplish that.

The only thing that would suck for me is a friend of mine is a mayweather fanboy(not the same as fan)... so i would have to hear him say PBF is better than Sugar Ray Robinson for months... that would get annoying.

[hugh grant]

For me to even consider PBF made Pac look amatuerish, PBF would needed to have put some hurt and punches on Pac.
I wont be impressed if PBF just avoids taking any bombs during the fight. Even Cotto avoided taking bombs when he started to backpeddle, and then it wasnt much of a fight.
When Cotto tried to duke it out with Pac is when Cotto got in trouble.

[p4p-champ]

I wouldn't be in the least bit surprised but it would be great for the world to see and appreciate what Floyd can do.

[grownfolk.us]

Feel like thats how it should of been. Can't see Floyd not using his reach advantage to just destroy Pac!

[big_james10]

I have a serious question for the Floyd haters on this site. Will someone please define the word "running"?

That seems to be the most common criticism among the Floyd haters on this site and it makes absolutely no sense, even on this site. You can't win 40 consecutive fights and acquire a 62 percent KO ratio by "running". You have to outbox your opponent, hit him more times than he hits you and hit him hard enough to knock him out. If "running" means not standing in the center of the ring and slugging it out like they do in MMA, then Pacquaio would have to be considered a runner also. Pac never stood in front of De La Hoya and slugged it out. He hit it with combinations and got out of the way to avoid being hit.

So will someone, anyone, please give me a logical explanation on how Floyd is a "runner?"

[Konstantin]

I have a serious question for the Floyd haters on this site. Will someone please define the word "running"?

That seems to be the most common criticism among the Floyd haters on this site and it makes absolutely no sense, even on this site. You can't win 40 consecutive fights and acquire a 62 percent KO ratio by "running". You have to outbox your opponent, hit him more times than he hits you and hit him hard enough to knock him out. If "running" means not standing in the center of the ring and slugging it out like they do in MMA, then Pacquaio would have to be considered a runner also. Pac never stood in front of De La Hoya and slugged it out. He hit it with combinations and got out of the way to avoid being hit.

So will someone, anyone, please give me a logical explanation on how Floyd is a "runner?"

Watch Floyd DLH and Pac DLH and if you can't understand how 1 of them is running and the other isn't...

I would be pretty disappointing, but not too much b/c I'm pretty sure that's exactly what will happen.