Do you agree with Burner .............

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DLT
    DMV
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Nov 2004
    • 17087
    • 737
    • 35
    • 24,277

    #11
    Originally posted by Earl-Hickey
    Also it needs to be noted that Pacquiao is better at fighting southpaws than right handed fighters.
    what...............?

    Comment

    • krispy kreme
      Fiendin for toilet water
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 10832
      • 358
      • 898
      • 18,913

      #12
      Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
      I disagree but the real quesion is,

      Will Pacquiao resort to his old self when faced against Mayweather?
      Good point, I don't think he will revert back to his one two style. But Mayweather makes so many adjustments, it's hard to say, but Pacquiao seems to be very good at sticking to a game plan.

      Comment

      • Earl-Hickey
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2009
        • 29031
        • 2,832
        • 1,384
        • 297,750

        #13
        Originally posted by DLT
        what...............?
        Cotto for example, was the orthodox fighter, but he fought from southpaw, and messed himself up because he was fighting pac from the wrong angle, if that make sense

        Comment

        • billionaire
          Banned
          • Jul 2008
          • 1930
          • 160
          • 90
          • 2,411

          #14
          yes i agree manny has just gotten physically stronger........look at the past 4 opponents none had defensive skills....still i scored the 2nd fight for pac.....

          Comment

          • DLT
            DMV
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Nov 2004
            • 17087
            • 737
            • 35
            • 24,277

            #15
            Originally posted by Earl-Hickey
            Cotto for example, was the orthodox fighter, but he fought from southpaw, and messed himself up because he was fighting pac from the wrong angle, if that make sense
            Cotto was Southpaw? Maybe for 5 seconds the whole fight, right?

            Comment

            • RightCross94
              Banned
              • Apr 2009
              • 2899
              • 158
              • 150
              • 3,933

              #16
              Originally posted by .Carl.
              I think has made significant improvement, but Marquez just has the style to give him trouble.

              Burner dislikes Pacquiao, it's crystal clear now
              .
              I don't think Burner is going to any lengths to hide the fact he dislikes Pacquiao

              Comment

              • Syf
                KO Artist
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Sep 2009
                • 7574
                • 291
                • 191
                • 14,978

                #17
                Originally posted by Dynamite Kid
                Do you agree with Burner when he says that Manny has not improved that much from the 2nd Marquez fight? im not gonna quote him word for word but he seems to be saying that its the opponents he has been fighting that have glossed over his technical flaws but those flaws still there. Do you agree.

                I think its valid TO A DEGREE. To say he has not improved and that its just! the opponents style is a bit over the top imo, but i myself dont think he has! improved all the much DEFENSIVELY, so in a way i can see where Burner is coming from, albeit he is not giving Pac enough credit for the fact there are clearly certain aspects of his game that have improved. I also think Burner is right to a degree when he says that a lot of Manny's recent wins are guys who are made for his sharp shooting style, not that its the only!
                reason why he is beating these guys.

                Marquez fight was in 2008, its only 2009 now. Pacquiao got a draw against Marquez in the second fight on my card, knockdown being the deciding factor, however if i was to run with who i felt deserved to win that fight i would of said JMM.



                So what is you take on this?
                nah pac has changed..

                he a much more solid and two handed fighter now than when he fought JMM.

                with less random explosiveness, and more quasi on the fly calculated destruction

                There's a clear difference.

                Comment

                • S A M U R A I
                  Bulletproof
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 181694
                  • 1,495
                  • 1,324
                  • 1,419,318

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Dynamite Kid
                  Do you agree with Burner when he says that Manny has not improved that much from the 2nd Marquez fight? im not gonna quote him word for word but he seems to be saying that its the opponents he has been fighting that have glossed over his technical flaws but those flaws still there. Do you agree.

                  I think its valid TO A DEGREE. To say he has not improved and that its just! the opponents style is a bit over the top imo, but i myself dont think he has! improved all the much DEFENSIVELY, so in a way i can see where Burner is coming from, albeit he is not giving Pac enough credit for the fact there are clearly certain aspects of his game that have improved. I also think Burner is right to a degree when he says that a lot of Manny's recent wins are guys who are made for his sharp shooting style, not that its the only!
                  reason why he is beating these guys.

                  Marquez fight was in 2008, its only 2009 now. Pacquiao got a draw against Marquez in the second fight on my card, knockdown being the deciding factor, however if i was to run with who i felt deserved to win that fight i would of said JMM.



                  So what is you take on this?
                  I see improvement. Maybe not a huge amount since the 2nd Marquez fight, but compared to the older, more reckless version of Pacquiao the improvement is pretty significant. He's a better thinker now. Technically, everything has been in place for years, only it gets more finely tuned all the time. Am I making sense with this? Pacquiao keeps improving all the time because he's still working on things that he's been working on for many years, not just since Marquez.

                  The guy is still hungry to learn. You know how it is because Roach has talked about it often -- he can't keep Manny away once he starts training, the team have to stop him and slow him down. The guy still fights like he has a fire under his ass and it's made him constantly get better, plus he is stronger since he doesn't cut nearly as much weight these days, so with everything considered, the current version of Pacquiao is a beast.



                  100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

                  Comment

                  • Bushbaby
                    Wild Apache
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 23514
                    • 727
                    • 370
                    • 32,078

                    #19
                    When Marquez & Pacman fought,Marquez was a very good fighter,fighting at his weight class!!I wouldn't say a thing about Pacman in those performances because that Marquez was probably the most technically sound fighter pfp!!Marquez above 135 was pushing it!!Marquez below was spectacular!!But Manny has improved in every fight to me,punch resistance,power,stamina & speed have all looked better each outing!!Yes he lacks defense,but he has the most prolific offense at 147 & below,period!!

                    Comment

                    • struglerer
                      Banned
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 577
                      • 12
                      • 2
                      • 652

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Dynamite Kid
                      Do you agree with Burner when he says that Manny has not improved that much from the 2nd Marquez fight? im not gonna quote him word for word but he seems to be saying that its the opponents he has been fighting that have glossed over his technical flaws but those flaws still there. Do you agree.

                      I think its valid TO A DEGREE. To say he has not improved and that its just! the opponents style is a bit over the top imo, but i myself dont think he has! improved all the much DEFENSIVELY, so in a way i can see where Burner is coming from, albeit he is not giving Pac enough credit for the fact there are clearly certain aspects of his game that have improved. I also think Burner is right to a degree when he says that a lot of Manny's recent wins are guys who are made for his sharp shooting style, not that its the only!
                      reason why he is beating these guys.



                      Marquez fight was in 2008, its only 2009 now. Pacquiao got a draw against Marquez in the second fight on my card, knockdown being the deciding factor, however if i was to run with who i felt deserved to win that fight i would of said JMM.



                      So what is you take on this?

                      burner is a confused kid........hes got hes hate shades on.............he aint objective

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP