New article on floyd...good read!

[sycomantz]

This article failed.

spoken like a true *******

[-MAKAVELLI-]

floyd owns all and is in a class of his own.

pac will get owned.

**** the haters

you figured out how long a decade is yet?

[Levcon8686]

Makes sense on many levels. He gets f-all credit when you look at what he has done. The only people boxing today that have better resumes than him are: Hopkins, Pacquaio, Mosley (and that's debatable with 5 L's). No others spring to mind. I think he's a rare talent and admire his skills but I understand how he's just not for some people. Even if he beat Pacquaio, Mosley and Cotto, he'd still be called boring, egotistical, etc. Those that don't appreciate him already never will.

[sycomantz]

you figured out how long a decade is yet?

sure do, pacy tardy

[jrosales13]

spoken like a true *******

Really you spoken like a true nuthugger... Did you even read the article? Are you saying this article is filled with facts?

[-MAKAVELLI-]

sure do, pacy tardy

good...its gratifying to see *******S educating *****s

[sycomantz]

Really you spoken like a true nuthugger... Did you even read the article? Are you saying this article is filled with facts?

yes i read the article, and you would say the same nonesense even if it was filled with facts.

fact of the matter is, what the writer said was true. floyd is held to a standard others arent and its b/c hes so great

people love to hate the man at the top of the hill, in hopes the underdog can end his reign.

but its not going to happen, pac wont beat floyd and people will contine to say, "floyd should fight *insert name here*"

[jrosales13]

yes i read the article, and you would say the same nonesense even if it was filled with facts.

fact of the matter is, what the writer said was true. floyd is held to a standard others arent and its b/c hes so great

people love to hate the man at the top of the hill, in hopes the underdog can end his reign.

but its not going to happen, pac wont beat floyd and people will contine to say, "floyd should fight *insert name here*"

Don't assume **** about me.... How is what the writer said was true. When the article missed some facts. There is holes in his argument. So again the article failed in that sense.

And, you talking a lot **** if Pac has no chance. Real talk quit the nuthugging. And, honestly what percentage do you give Pac of winning?

[sycomantz]

Don't assume **** about me.... How is what the writer said was true. When the article missed some facts. There is holes in his argument. So again the article failed in that sense.

And, you talking a lot **** if Pac has no chance. Real talk quit the nuthugging. And, honestly what percentage do you give Pac of winning?

no nuthugging here. i give pac a 30% chance of winning...real talk

if he beats may, he greats full credit and is the best boxer of this era but he wont

and as i mentioned, it he was filled with facts, you would hate still.

presenting fact would end up being a waste of time anyways. yall would simply overlook them like yall always do

[Mayweather101]

u guys need to relize that this is the truth...the truth is gonna hit *******s hard on the 13th