Khan. I would say Haye, but I think he needs to have another fight or two in heavyweight with some decent fighters. Valuev though is a great win. Froch hasn't impressed me, barely winning against Taylor and Dirrell isn't notable. Khan derailing Kotelinik, MAB, and Salita in a round is much better in my view.
froch...wbc belt is he best, hes undefeated, beaten 3 world class opponets in a row..
the guys a badass...
Say what? The only belt that counts is The Ring belt. The WBC are no better or worse than the WBA, the IBF or the WBO - they are all corrupt en****** destroying boxing with multiple belts and arrogance.
Haye is currently the best British fighter as a two weight champion, closely followed by Froch. Khan is the most talented though.
As of now and as far as I can tell David Haye is the most complete fighter of the three. Khan may well overtake him in the next year or so depending on whether Warren puts him in against someone who'll truly test Khan and let us gauge his ability for real.
froch...wbc belt is he best, hes undefeated, beaten 3 world class opponets in a row..
the guys a badass...
Yes indeed my friend. I think he's the one who can take it the farthest. I like Haye, I really do but a large part of me feels the reason for him being in his current position is due to the sheer emptiness of the HW division. Furthermore, I really feel as though Froch epitomises what it means to be a tough, rugged, hard hitting British boxer. I don't believe he's the best in the division, yet. I've said this for a long time, but Froch will become a much better boxer once he loses his 0, which is going to happen. Then I expect him to learn some lessons and really clean house in SMW.
Comment