Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why does Arum and Roach continue to baby and shield Pacquaio from a real challenge?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why does Arum and Roach continue to baby and shield Pacquaio from a real challenge?

    In addition to an age advantage, statistics prove that Pacquiao has been fighting opponents that have been recently defeated or are on the decline. During his present winning streak, the average winning percentage of Pacquiao’s opponents throughout their entire career is an impressive 94%. However, when further analyzing the data it becomes apparent that the average winning percentage of Pacquiao’s opponents during the five fights leading up to the their respective bout declines to 84% and the average winning percentage of his opponents after their bout took place, not including the loss to Pacquiao, drops to a measly 67%. Considering the data at hand, can the argument be made that Pacquiao is consistently fighting opponents that are older, statistically on the decline and have been recently defeated?

  • #2
    so whos the real challenge for pacquaio then??? maywheather?? dont tell me after pac ko this guy that he is out of his prime and old!!!! :wank:

    Comment


    • #3
      so mayweather isn't a real challenge?

      Comment


      • #4
        yeah, they are totally protecting pacquiao. I mean, what a ***** for fighting mayweather right? it's a tune up at best!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Cockfighter69 View Post
          In addition to an age advantage, statistics prove that Pacquiao has been fighting opponents that have been recently defeated or are on the decline. During his present winning streak, the average winning percentage of Pacquiao’s opponents throughout their entire career is an impressive 94%. However, when further analyzing the data it becomes apparent that the average winning percentage of Pacquiao’s opponents during the five fights leading up to the their respective bout declines to 84% and the average winning percentage of his opponents after their bout took place, not including the loss to Pacquiao, drops to a measly 67%. Considering the data at hand, can the argument be made that Pacquiao is consistently fighting opponents that are older, statistically on the decline and have been recently defeated?
          Yea. And he ducked the Klit bros. ****ing *****!

          Comment


          • #6
            this thread is an utter failure..seriously......the 2 best fighters in the world are about to fight..no catchweight,no bull**** clauses..and thread starter still complains.....wow

            Comment


            • #7
              good question

              Comment


              • #8
                Well 2 years layoff does have an impact.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Your Avatar and SIg says that you are genuinely Gay!

                  Comment


                  • #10

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP