Wladimir was always better than Vitali

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ray*
    Be safe!!!
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 44867
    • 1,654
    • 1,608
    • 558,890

    #31
    Originally posted by IronMike1966
    i don't care what you guys say but IMO for me Wladimir was better fighter than Vitali he has weaker chin still i call him best of the brothers
    I have alway classed him as the better one of the two guys, Technically he has more to offer than Vitali, Wlad is also more fluid and has more slickness to him than Vitali. Vitali even though has an effective fighting style fights more like a robot.

    Comment

    • True Guru
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2009
      • 1648
      • 138
      • 0
      • 1,845

      #32
      Wlad is way more skilled than Vitali,Had the better amateur record and got a Olympic Gold medal.
      If Wlad had Vitalis chin then Wlad would be unbeaten to this very day and probably never lose.
      Vitalis got the better chin and heart but Wlad is very fast for a man of his size and his jab is like a power punch.
      I think Wlad would cut Vitali up and win on a stoppage.

      Comment

      • Mr. Philadel
        #215Boxing
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 20893
        • 1,071
        • 1,413
        • 35,332

        #33
        Wlad is the BEST HW in the world and that makes him better than Vitali....Vitali is the toughest of the 2 and maybe the strongest......but Wlad has accomplished......let me say that again.....ACCOMPLISHED more than big bro in this sport!!!

        Comment

        • PensionKiller
          Khan Kills Kell
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Sep 2009
          • 9521
          • 224
          • 207
          • 18,489

          #34
          Originally posted by Mathematics
          I agree --- Wladimir is certainly the more skilled fighter --- and has been the more dominant over the past 5 years.

          It's interesting how people cite Vitali's *loss* to Lewis as reasoning why he is better than Wladimir...

          mind you - a loss to an under-motivated, out-of-shape Lewis who definitely didn't put his best forward...

          and yes - a *loss*

          These same people never mention that Wladimir beat the hell out of Chris Byrd - *twice* --- yea - the same guy Vitali lost to.

          their overall careers are quite similar - but there is no way that Vitali Klitschko belongs in the same ring with Wladimir Klitschko in 2009-2010.

          Wlad would punish him severely.

          Vitali has zero mustard left on his uncoordinated arm-punches --- but he does have tremendous heart.

          Wlad would outclass him.

          now Wlad v. Vitali in 2003? that would be exciting.
          Vitali got injured VS byrd no?

          Vitali use to beat Wlad up in sparring wehn Vitali was in prime. Clearly he isn't now.

          37 lewis VS 38 VITALI HMMMMMMMMM

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP