the commision should not have caved into political pressure. they should have studied the actual evidence and seen that campbell obviously quit before the completion of 4 rounds to save himself from a loss.
the commision should not have caved into political pressure. they should have studied the actual evidence and seen that campbell obviously quit before the completion of 4 rounds to save himself from a loss.
Absolutely! Campbell quit and was acting like a diva.
the commision should not have caved into political pressure. they should have studied the actual evidence and seen that campbell obviously quit before the completion of 4 rounds to save himself from a loss.
Political pressure? Uhmmmm, from who?? Bush? *****? LOL
The commission spent almost 4 hours looking at slow-motion replays from 3 different camera angles, as well as testimony from their medical experts and ringside doctor. And in a 4-1 vote they decided that Bradley sticking his whole forehead into Nate's eye socket JUST MIGHT have had something to do with Nate's eye injury. (especially considering that Bradley, with all his big muscles, cant crack an egg)
But hey, dont let anything like FACTS get in the way of your little hate fest......
And to the TS question, yes, it was changed on Aug 24th. The media reported on it, but it seems more stories were written about Nate going after Bradley on the street after the hearing than were written about the actual hearing itself......
Stay updated with the latest boxing news, fight results, interviews, and rankings. Get real-time coverage of upcoming bouts, analysis, and exclusive insights from the world of boxing.
Comment