Lamont Peterson vs Pauli Malignaggi

[Freddy Krueger]

I would make a topic of Pauli vs Bradley but we all know that Pauli would get his ass beat in that fight. It's too much for him to fight the winner of bradley/peterson. Pauli is a loser so he fights losers of fights not winners.

[hammerhiem]

Paulie gets hate because he lost to Hatton.

The guy is a good boxer with a great chin.

In the same way hatton is underrated becauise he lost to Floyd and pac (ATG's) Paulie is under rated because he lost to Cotto and Hatton (World class fighters) he deserved to win the first Diaz fight and showed it in the rematch.

Peterson just got dominated by a decent techincal fighter but paulie is technically better than Bradley, I see an equally wide UD in Paulie's favour.

[Tmann400]

peterson UD. peterson would rough his way inside and break malignaggi down to the body. malignaggi is no timothy bradley.

[Tmann400]

Paulie gets hate because he lost to Hatton.

The guy is a good boxer with a great chin.

In the same way hatton is underrated becauise he lost to Floyd and pac (ATG's) Paulie is under rated because he lost to Cotto and Hatton (World class fighters) he deserved to win the first Diaz fight and showed it in the rematch.

Peterson just got dominated by a decent techincal fighter but paulie is technically better than Bradley, I see an equally wide UD in Paulie's favour.

malignaggi looks good against guys that are plodders and dont have defense like diaz. peterson would get inside on malignaggi and rip him to the body. peterson also is a natural 140 lber unlike diaz and has a pretty long reach.

[Joe2608]

Peterson would win it imo. Peterson is a good fighter, only problem was he was up against an elite fighter in Bradley.