Like both but Khan has far more going for him then Froch.
Who do you like more, Amir Khan or Carl Froch?
Collapse
-
-
I don't like Froch that much, but I will always respect him for the way he beat Taylor, cause I was in the building and it made for great excitement.
Khan seems like the fortunate son. More naturally gifted.
Don't really like either, but I pick Froch because at least he's a ballsy mfer.Comment
-
Personality-wise, Khan has always seemed a bit wooden and uncharismatic to me. Froch seems like a decent, sensible guy, at least when he isn't in back and forward arguments with people. I like listening to what Froch has to say, he usually makes good points and isn't a jealous or bitter guy. Inside the ring though, I'm not sure. I think Amir is one of the most naturally talented boxers I've ever seen. I'm always in awe of his speed and he's exciting watch, but so is Froch. I feel Froch is always a little underrated as well. Overall I'd say Froch, but I like both guys.Comment
-
-
Froch, as I don't like Khan.
And no, it's not because he's ******, sometimes it's ok to dislike people regardless of their race or religion and even disabled gay Maori single-moms can be c*nts.Comment
-
I'm British-Asian so I respect what Khan has acheived and can relate to him and he's a good role model for all British kids..
I also like Froch because I study in Nottingham (where Froch is from) so I've seen a few of his fights in pubs and there's always a buzz when he fights. He's very entertaining to watch too - good chin and hard hitting, he's a real pugilist. But Khan is fast, explosive, has power and skill, and Freddie ^^ so I prefer Khan..Comment
-
Froch, he might be a deluded ego maniac but he will fight anyone! and he is generally involved in great fights.
Khan and his team negotiate his career around big punchers, Khan is and his team are con men.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment