Mayweather backing out of March 13 fight against Pacquiao?

[big_james10]

u notice, it's always the pac fans or the floyd haters that pull up **** like this....best case scenario for them is if floyd does back out...

ain't happening.

True. Another think you should notice. All the Pac fans are talking trash right now. However, the closer we get to March 13, the more you will start seeing excuses "just in case" Pac loses. By the week of the fight, there will be twice as many posts with excuses as there are trash talking posts right now. How do I know this? I saw the same thing when Mayweather signed to fight Ricky Hatton.

[big_james10]

I hope this fight will not go through. Why wouldn't pacman just retire and concentrate to his new found career in politics? I mean he's already a legend in the sport and he doesn't need to prove anything.

I have news for your, dude and it may come as quite a shock to you. Pacquaio doesn't give a damn about his legacy! Pacquaio fought Cotto because he felt he could make a lot of money against a guy he was convinced he could beat. He fought Hatton for the same reason. He is fighting Mayweather because he will make three times as much money as he made on the Cotto fight. This fight doesn't have a damn thing to do with his status in the sport. It is all about money. The difference between Mayweather and Pacquaio and Oscar De La Hoya is Mayweather actually has enough guts to say that he fights only for the money. Pac and Oscar feed us bull**** by telling us they are fighting for pride or legacy. The saddest part about that is there are 1,000 people on this site who believe this crap.

[big_james10]

base on floyd's resume, he is a ducker......its no secret!

Please provide us with FACTS and name one fighter Floyd has ducked! You don't have the right to include Cotto and Mosley because it has already been proven that he did not duck them.

[top7gun]

I have news for your, dude and it may come as quite a shock to you. Pacquaio doesn't give a damn about his legacy! Pacquaio fought Cotto because he felt he could make a lot of money against a guy he was convinced he could beat. He fought Hatton for the same reason. He is fighting Mayweather because he will make three times as much money as he made on the Cotto fight. This fight doesn't have a damn thing to do with his status in the sport. It is all about money. The difference between Mayweather and Pacquaio and Oscar De La Hoya is Mayweather actually has enough guts to say that he fights only for the money. Pac and Oscar feed us bull**** by telling us they are fighting for pride or legacy. The saddest part about that is there are 1,000 people on this site who believe this crap.

and you're one of the few being ignored...

[big_james10]

and you're one of the few being ignored...

Its odd then, that your ****** ass decided to respond to my post.

[RodBarker]

I have news for your, dude and it may come as quite a shock to you. Pacquaio doesn't give a damn about his legacy! Pacquaio fought Cotto because he felt he could make a lot of money against a guy he was convinced he could beat. He fought Hatton for the same reason. He is fighting Mayweather because he will make three times as much money as he made on the Cotto fight. This fight doesn't have a damn thing to do with his status in the sport. It is all about money. The difference between Mayweather and Pacquaio and Oscar De La Hoya is Mayweather actually has enough guts to say that he fights only for the money. Pac and Oscar feed us bull**** by telling us they are fighting for pride or legacy. The saddest part about that is there are 1,000 people on this site who believe this crap.

Truthful post , real world post , they are prize fighters , the rest is marketing and hype .

[top7gun]

Its odd then, that your ****** ass decided to respond to my post.

i feel obliged only because it is my thread...

[El Jesus]

he is one of the better writer in ''examiner'' though, better than the american guy called stolow and at par with marley.

he is absolutely terrible. he has virtually no credential and truthfully he injects alot of needless racial commentary into what he says. his use of non-sequiturs, and slippery slope arguments in his articles are downright patheitc. take ring magainze, the way they make their critical articles on say, a mayweather, is well thought out and served with facts and an argument that lends credibility. this guy is no better than the posters on here. You agree with it because you yourself feed into that bull**** because you agree with it, no matter how mundane it is. The guy is a moron, and id have no problem telling him that. He constantly feels the need to take shots at black culture and hides behind the guise of "i have black friends", i hate that. knowing black people isnt an excuse to be ignorant and the reason why he gets play on here is because hes a pac writer/fan.

There is nothing objective or memorable about him or his writing style, hes an idiot on nearly every front.

[top7gun]

he is absolutely terrible. he has virtually no credential and truthfully he injects alot of needless racial commentary into what he says. his use of non-sequiturs, and slippery slope arguments in his articles are downright patheitc. take ring magainze, the way they make their critical articles on say, a mayweather, is well thought out and served with facts and an argument that lends credibility. this guy is no better than the posters on here. You agree with it because you yourself feed into that bull**** because you agree with it, no matter how mundane it is. The guy is a moron, and id have no problem telling him that. He constantly feels the need to take shots at black culture and hides behind the guise of "i have black friends", i hate that. knowing black people isnt an excuse to be ignorant and the reason why he gets play on here is because hes a pac writer/fan.

There is nothing objective or memorable about him or his writing style, hes an idiot on nearly every front.

i guessed appreciation of articles are like clothings and music...
it all boils down to a matter of opinion...

[arraamis]

he is absolutely terrible. he has virtually no credential and truthfully he injects alot of needless racial commentary into what he says. his use of non-sequiturs, and slippery slope arguments in his articles are downright patheitc. take ring magainze, the way they make their critical articles on say, a mayweather, is well thought out and served with facts and an argument that lends credibility. this guy is no better than the posters on here. You agree with it because you yourself feed into that bull**** because you agree with it, no matter how mundane it is. The guy is a moron, and id have no problem telling him that. He constantly feels the need to take shots at black culture and hides behind the guise of "i have black friends", i hate that. knowing black people isnt an excuse to be ignorant and the reason why he gets play on here is because hes a pac writer/fan.

There is nothing objective or memorable about him or his writing style, hes an idiot on nearly every front.

Agreed!!!!

I don't like getting into race-debates, because they aways get ugly.

But it is kinda funny that when people make disparaging remarks, they try to excuse\justify it with the "I have friends who are {Insert color here}" - Total BS.

The guy who wrote that article didn't back up one thing he stated with a legitimate reference that can be verified. The article is pure opinionated speculation ...... Nothing more.